On Wed, 4 May 2011 17:49:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> How about you look at git and see what happened last time?
>
> We added some dri2 proto requests, and people wanted to build with old
> versions w/o the new requests. So they added some ifdefs but didn't
> check all the combos (now not just
On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:32:46 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 4 May 2011 16:16:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
>
> Is there any way we could do this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
Is there any way we could do this and NOT break building older versions
of Mesa? I'd like to be able to buil
