Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

2022-04-04 Thread Thomas Hellström
On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 10:25 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > On 18/03/2022 18:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Maybe also good to add dri-devel to these discussions. > > > > I'm not sure where exactly we landed with dgpu error capture (maybe > > I > > should check the code but it's really w/e here), but I

Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

2022-03-31 Thread Matthew Auld
On 18/03/2022 18:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: Maybe also good to add dri-devel to these discussions. I'm not sure where exactly we landed with dgpu error capture (maybe I should check the code but it's really w/e here), but I think we can also toss in "you need a non-recoverable context for error ca

Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

2022-03-20 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 3/18/22 19:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: Maybe also good to add dri-devel to these discussions. I'm not sure where exactly we landed with dgpu error capture (maybe I should check the code but it's really w/e here), but I think we can also toss in "you need a non-recoverable context for error cap

Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

2022-03-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
Maybe also good to add dri-devel to these discussions. I'm not sure where exactly we landed with dgpu error capture (maybe I should check the code but it's really w/e here), but I think we can also toss in "you need a non-recoverable context for error capture to work on dgpu". Since that simplifie