Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Continue also for dry runs

2017-08-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> It's a bit silly to have to spec both -d and -f to see what dim would >> all complain about. And dry-run should never cause bad side-effects. > > Ack. > > We don't do dry-run all that well in general

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Continue also for dry runs

2017-08-03 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's a bit silly to have to spec both -d and -f to see what dim would > all complain about. And dry-run should never cause bad side-effects. Ack. We don't do dry-run all that well in general, partly because you need to have one part actually succeed to