On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:30:39 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>
> Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've
> got an nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs
> rather than Intel GPUs?
Intel GPUs only exist on I
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:30:39 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>
> Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've
> got an nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs
> rather than Intel GPUs?
Intel GPUs only exist on In
Ok, well I'll give it a shot then. I've dealt with enough autoconf to make a
decent first pass.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 04:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>>
>> Shouldn't I be able to build and test suppor
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>
> Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
> nVidia card in my box now? ?Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than
> Intel GPUs?
The issue is that we pretty muc
Ok, well I'll give it a shot then. I've dealt with enough autoconf to make a
decent first pass.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 04:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>>
>> Shouldn't I be able to build and test suppor
Maybe I'm missing something here...
Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than Intel
GPUs?
On Jan 28, 2012, at 17:55, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:57:10 -0800, Jeremy Huddl
libdrm is still failing 'make check':
Linux/ppc - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0007/logs/libdrm/#check
Linux/ppc64 - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0013/logs/libdrm/#check
I bisected it to the commit below (which added the failing tests). Are these
tests broken? Can the
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>
> Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
> nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than
> Intel GPUs?
The issue is that we pretty muc
Maybe I'm missing something here...
Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than Intel
GPUs?
On Jan 28, 2012, at 17:55, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:57:10 -0800, Jeremy Huddl
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:57:10 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> libdrm is still failing 'make check':
>
> Linux/ppc - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0007/logs/libdrm/#check
> Linux/ppc64 - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0013/logs/libdrm/#check
>
> I bisected it to the commi
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:57:10 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> libdrm is still failing 'make check':
>
> Linux/ppc - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0007/logs/libdrm/#check
> Linux/ppc64 - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0013/logs/libdrm/#check
>
> I bisected it to the commit
libdrm is still failing 'make check':
Linux/ppc - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0007/logs/libdrm/#check
Linux/ppc64 - http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-28-0013/logs/libdrm/#check
I bisected it to the commit below (which added the failing tests). Are these
tests broken? Can the
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:48:56 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> Well that's a ppc box, so maybe endianness issues... ?
Oh, that's probably it. But I'd say it's more a bug that Intel libdrm
is being built on ppc.
pgpUm6kwWVbPV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
Well that's a ppc box, so maybe endianness issues... ?
On Jan 7, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
>
> It
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
It make checks fine here, on 32 and 64. Not sure what's up.
pgpvxFc5HfvHt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform
> feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being
16 matches
Mail list logo
