RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-17 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:44:52AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 15 February 2016 at 20:06, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea > > with a > > bit more thought. My motiviation for group maintainership of drm-misc was

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-17 Thread Patrik Jakobsson
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:44:52AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On 15 February 2016 at 20:06, Daniel Vetter >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea >> > with a >> > bit mor

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:44:52AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 15 February 2016 at 20:06, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea > > with a > > bit more thought. My motiviation for group maintainership of drm-misc was

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-16 Thread Dave Airlie
On 15 February 2016 at 20:06, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea with > a > bit more thought. My motiviation for group maintainership of drm-misc was > that I > got a bit a guilty feeling the last few vacations/conferences

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-16 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> I'm finding with i915 for example there is a massive latency in the pipeline >> now >> waiting for fixes, and the pipeline to the end of drm-intel-next is >> very long and >> hard to figure out wha

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > I'm finding with i915 for example there is a massive latency in the pipeline > now > waiting for fixes, and the pipeline to the end of drm-intel-next is > very long and > hard to figure out what fixes should be pulled back, and how much of the

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-15 Thread Eric Anholt
Daniel Vetter writes: > Hi all, > > I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea with > a > bit more thought. My motiviation for group maintainership of drm-misc was > that I > got a bit a guilty feeling the last few vacations/conferences when folks > pinged > about

RFC: group maintainership for misc drm trees

2016-02-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, I've already chatted with some of you in private, here's the entire idea with a bit more thought. My motiviation for group maintainership of drm-misc was that I got a bit a guilty feeling the last few vacations/conferences when folks pinged about reviewed/tested pretty patches not landing.