>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:19:11 + (UTC)
> From: Joakim Plate
> Subject: Re: RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>>&g
> >
> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
Only
> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
clock.
> >
>
> App that rely on it being anything special are badly broken and i
> don't think there is any such app. The specifi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
>> Only
>>> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
>> clock.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>
>> >
>> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
> Only
>> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
> clock.
>> >
>>
>> App that rely on it being anything special are badly
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:19:11 + (UTC)
> From: Joakim Plate
> Subject: Re: RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>>>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
>> Only
>>> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
>> clock.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>
>> >
>> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
> Only
>> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
> clock.
>> >
>>
>> App that rely on it being anything special are badly
> >
> > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000.
Only
> > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME
clock.
> >
>
> App that rely on it being anything special are badly broken and i
> don't think there is any such app. The specifi
Michel D?nzer daenzer.net> writes:
> > >
> > > From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec:
> > >
> > > The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically
> > > increasing counter [...]
> > >
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
> Michel D?nzer daenzer.net> writes:
>
>> > >
>> > > ?From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec:
>> > >
>> > > ? ? ? ? ?The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically
>> > > ? ? ? ? ?increasing counter [...]
>> > >
>
> From what I can t
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
> Michel Dänzer daenzer.net> writes:
>
>> > >
>> > > From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec:
>> > >
>> > > The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically
>> > > increasing counter [...]
>> > >
>
> From what I can t
Michel Dänzer daenzer.net> writes:
> > >
> > > From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec:
> > >
> > > The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically
> > > increasing counter [...]
> > >
From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000. Only
is
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 20:04:03 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Isn't CLOCK_MONOTONIC per-process?
"This clock represents the monotonic clock for the system."
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/clock_getres.html)
So, no.
Cheers,
Julien
On Die, 2012-06-12 at 20:04 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 03:02 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
> >> presentation of video frames in xbmc.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 20:04:03 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Isn't CLOCK_MONOTONIC per-process?
"This clock represents the monotonic clock for the system."
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/clock_getres.html)
So, no.
Cheers,
Julien
___
On Die, 2012-06-12 at 20:04 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 03:02 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
> >> presentation of video frames in xbmc.
On 06/11/2012 03:02 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
presentation of video frames in xbmc.
I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what
time
On 06/11/2012 03:02 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
>> presentation of video frames in xbmc.
>>
>> I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't spe
On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
> presentation of video frames in xbmc.
>
> I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what
> time the UST clock really is, nor ca
On Son, 2012-06-10 at 11:56 +, Joakim Plate wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
> presentation of video frames in xbmc.
>
> I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what
> time the UST clock really is, nor ca
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
presentation of video frames in xbmc.
I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what
time the UST clock really is, nor can i find any mention of it elsewhere
in docs.
Code wise it seem to be
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule
presentation of video frames in xbmc.
I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what
time the UST clock really is, nor can i find any mention of it elsewhere
in docs.
Code wise it seem to be
22 matches
Mail list logo
