On 02.12.11 21:48:20, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> BTW I always see (mostly only on screen, sometimes in the logs):
>
> [Firmware Bug]: cpu 2, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0x10400,
> but the register is already in use for vector 0xf9 on another cpu
> [Firmware Bug]: cpu 2, IBS int
On 2011.12.07 at 15:32 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 02.12.11 21:48:20, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > BTW I always see (mostly only on screen, sometimes in the logs):
> >
> > [Firmware Bug]: cpu 2, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector
> > 0x10400, but the register is already in use f
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:10:34PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> >> > Yes the patch finally fixes the issue for me (tested with 120 kexec
> >> > iterations).
> >> > Thanks Jerome!
> >>
> >> Can you do a kick run on the modified patch ?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
>> > Yes the patch finally fixes the issue for me (tested with 120 kexec
>> > iterations).
>> > Thanks Jerome!
>>
>> Can you do a kick run on the modified patch ?
>
> This one is also OK after ~60 iterations.
Jerome, could you please incl
On 2011.12.05 at 14:11 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:15:49PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.12.05 at 12:10 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Gl
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:15:49PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.12.05 at 12:10 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2011.12.05 at 12:10 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> > On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.12.05 at 12:10 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > wrote:
> > > On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all obj
> > If I had to guess it looks like 0 is getting written back to some
> > random page by the GPU maybe, it could be that the GPU is in some
half
> > setup state at boot or on a reboot does it happen from a cold boot
or
> > just warm boot or kexec?
>
> Only happened with kexec thus far. Cold boot
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
>> wrote:
>> > On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
>>
On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
>> On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue a
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
>> >> > > > exactly the same spot ag
On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
> >> > > > exactly the same spot again. (CCing the drm list)
>
> If I had to guess it looks like 0 i
>> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
>> > > >
>> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
>> > > > exactly the same spot again. (CCing the drm list)
If I had to guess it looks like 0 is getting written back to some
random page by the GPU maybe,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:50:40AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >
> > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> > >
> > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. B
On 2011.12.02 at 21:06 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.12.02 at 14:43 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:44:37AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.11.24 at 09:50 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lamet
On 2011.12.02 at 14:43 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:44:37AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.11.24 at 09:50 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:44:37AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.11.24 at 09:50 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >
> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2011.11.24 at 09:50 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the iss
On 2011.11.24 at 09:50 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >
> > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> > >
> > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I'v
On 2011.11.23 at 10:06 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> >
> > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
> > exactly the same spot again. (CCing the drm list)
>
> Well
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
>
> Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
> exactly the same spot again. (CCing the drm list)
Well this is looks like write after free.
> ==
On 2011.11.21 at 16:36 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.11.21 at 15:16 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 14:15 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf a écrit :
> >
> > > I've enabled CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON and this is what happend:
> > >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Please conti
25 matches
Mail list logo