ung.com; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: Review request to DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> >
> >> > Basically gem_dumb_* and gem_* are same operation. The difference
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
>> > Basically gem_dumb_* and gem_* are same operation. The difference
>> between
>> > them is that gem_dumb_ needs framebuffer information such width, height
>> and
>> > bpp to allocate buffer and gem_ needs only size. in case of gem_dumb_,
>> si
samsung.com; eric.y.m...@gmail.com; r...@ti.com
> Subject: Re: Review request to DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210.
>
> >> 2. I'm not sure why samsung_drm_fn_encoder exists, it looks like from
> >> the crtc mode set functions you call the encoder mode set fu
>> 2. I'm not sure why samsung_drm_fn_encoder exists, it looks like from
>> the crtc mode set functions you call the encoder mode set functions,
>> is it not possible to use the helper drm_crtc_helper_set_mode so that
>> the crtc mode set is called then the encoder ones without having the
>> explic
ts.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: Review request to DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210.
>
> > I had sent DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210 over the three times.
> >
> > But I didn't received any comments from you.
>
> I was sort of hoping someone else would t
; kyungmin.p...@samsung.com;
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Review request to DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210.
> I had sent DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210 over the three times.
>
> But I didn't received any comments from you.
I was sort of hoping someone els
> I had sent DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4210 over the three times.
>
> But I didn’t received any comments from you.
I was sort of hoping someone else would take a look at these ARM
drivers before me, it might be worth getting some inter-company review
between the vendors submitting drm compo
