Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-04-22 Thread Inki Dae
iresh.ku...@linaro.org] >> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 5:51 PM >> > To: Vikas Sajjan >> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; >> > jy0922.s...@samsung.com; inki@samsung.com; kgene@samsung.com; >> > linaro-ker

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-04-22 Thread Vikas Sajjan
PM > > To: Vikas Sajjan > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; > > jy0922.s...@samsung.com; inki@samsung.com; kgene@samsung.com; > > linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exy

RE: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-04-21 Thread Inki Dae
vger.kernel.org; > jy0922.s...@samsung.com; inki@samsung.com; kgene@samsung.com; > linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks > > On 1 April 2013 14:13, Vikas Sajjan wrote: > > While migrating to comm

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-04-01 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 1 April 2013 14:13, Vikas Sajjan wrote: > While migrating to common clock framework (CCF), found that the FIMD clocks s/found/we found/ > were pulled down by the CCF. > If CCF finds any clock(s) which has NOT been claimed by any of the > drivers, then such clock(s) are PULLed low by CCF. > >