The caching mode for buffer objects with VRAM as a possible placement was
forced to write-combined, regardless of placement.
However, write-combined system memory is expensive to allocate and even though
it is pooled, the pool is expensive to shrink, since it involves global CPU TLB
flushes.
M
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 06:39:04PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The caching mode for buffer objects with VRAM as a possible
> placement was forced to write-combined, regardless of placement.
>
> However, write-combined system memory is expensive to allocate and
> even though it is pooled, the
On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 18:39 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The caching mode for buffer objects with VRAM as a possible
> placement was forced to write-combined, regardless of placement.
>
> However, write-combined system memory is expensive to allocate and
> even though it is pooled, the pool is
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 06:39:04PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The caching mode for buffer objects with VRAM as a possible
> placement was forced to write-combined, regardless of placement.
>
> However, write-combined system memory is expensive to allocate and
> even though it is pooled, the
On 19/06/2024 17:39, Thomas Hellström wrote:
The caching mode for buffer objects with VRAM as a possible
placement was forced to write-combined, regardless of placement.
However, write-combined system memory is expensive to allocate and
even though it is pooled, the pool is expensive to shrink,
