On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:55:03PM -0500, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ struct xe_sched_job *xe_sched_job_create(struct
xe_exec_queue *q,
xe_exec_queue_get(job->q);
err = drm_sched_job_init(&job->drm, q->entity, 1, NULL,
-q->xef->drm->
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:51:33PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:42:22PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
xef is only valid if it's a job from userspace. For in-kernel jobs it
causes a NPD like below:
<4> [] RIP: 0010:xe_sched_job_create+0xbd/0x390 [xe]
..
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:55:03PM -0600, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Intel-xe On Behalf Of Lucas
> > De Marchi
> > Sent: 29 May 2025 03:12
> > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Brost, Matthew ; dri-
> > de...@lists.freedesktop.org; De Marchi, Luc
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-xe On Behalf Of Lucas
> De Marchi
> Sent: 29 May 2025 03:12
> To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Brost, Matthew ; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; De Marchi, Lucas ;
> Christian König ; Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
> ; Philipp Stanner
>
> Subjec
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:42:22PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> xef is only valid if it's a job from userspace. For in-kernel jobs it
> causes a NPD like below:
>
> <4> [] RIP: 0010:xe_sched_job_create+0xbd/0x390 [xe]
> ...
> <4> [] Call Trace:
> <4> []
>
