Problems caused by commit 6803ed69994a14824081adbf1b58fd21a9966215 to 2.6.38-rc5

2011-04-18 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 15:40 -0400, Bob Gleitsmann wrote: > Good day, night, or whatever, Hey, I've pushed a fix for this (solution 2 that you mentioned) to nouveau's git tree. I'll get it to Dave with the next batch of fixes for .39-rc. Ben. > > The above mentioned commit which changed the fla

Re: Problems caused by commit 6803ed69994a14824081adbf1b58fd21a9966215 to 2.6.38-rc5

2011-04-17 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 15:40 -0400, Bob Gleitsmann wrote: > Good day, night, or whatever, Hey, I've pushed a fix for this (solution 2 that you mentioned) to nouveau's git tree. I'll get it to Dave with the next batch of fixes for .39-rc. Ben. > > The above mentioned commit which changed the fla

Problems caused by commit 6803ed69994a14824081adbf1b58fd21a9966215 to 2.6.38-rc5

2011-04-17 Thread Bob Gleitsmann
Good day, night, or whatever, The above mentioned commit which changed the flags passed to nouveau_gem_new to domain creates a problem in nouveau_notifier_init_channel (in nouveau_notifier.c) when it calls nouveau_bo_pin with the domain flags. That function seems to want TTM_PL_FLAGs. If this p

Problems caused by commit 6803ed69994a14824081adbf1b58fd21a9966215 to 2.6.38-rc5

2011-04-17 Thread Bob Gleitsmann
Good day, night, or whatever, The above mentioned commit which changed the flags passed to nouveau_gem_new to domain creates a problem in nouveau_notifier_init_channel (in nouveau_notifier.c) when it calls nouveau_bo_pin with the domain flags. That function seems to want TTM_PL_FLAGs. If this p