On 2018-03-12 03:37 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Felix Kuehling
> wrote:
>> On 2018-03-07 03:34 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Again stop worrying about ioctl overhead, this isn't Windows. If you
can show the overhead as being a problem then address it, but I
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> On 2018-03-07 03:34 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>> Again stop worrying about ioctl overhead, this isn't Windows. If you
>>> can show the overhead as being a problem then address it, but I
>>> think it's premature worrying about it at this sta
On 2018-03-07 03:34 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Again stop worrying about ioctl overhead, this isn't Windows. If you
>> can show the overhead as being a problem then address it, but I
>> think it's premature worrying about it at this stage.
> I'd like syscall overhead to be small. But with recent
Thanks for the feedback. I'm answering some of your questions inline.
On 2018-03-06 06:09 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 7 March 2018 at 08:44, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
>> review that are related to the KFD ioctl AP
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:38:03AM +0100, Christian K??nig wrote:
>> Am 07.03.2018 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>> > On 7 March 2018 at 08:44, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Christian raised two potential issues in a rec
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:38:03AM +0100, Christian K??nig wrote:
> Am 07.03.2018 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> > On 7 March 2018 at 08:44, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
> > > review that are related to the
Am 07.03.2018 um 00:34 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:44:41PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Hi all,
Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
review that are related to the KFD ioctl APIs:
1. behaviour of -ERESTARTSYS
2. transactional nature o
Am 07.03.2018 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 7 March 2018 at 08:44, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Hi all,
Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
review that are related to the KFD ioctl APIs:
1. behaviour of -ERESTARTSYS
2. transactional nature of KFD ioctl defin
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:44:41PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
> review that are related to the KFD ioctl APIs:
>
> 1. behaviour of -ERESTARTSYS
> 2. transactional nature of KFD ioctl definitions, or lack ther
On 7 March 2018 at 08:44, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
> review that are related to the KFD ioctl APIs:
>
> 1. behaviour of -ERESTARTSYS
> 2. transactional nature of KFD ioctl definitions, or lack thereof
>
> I appreci
Hi all,
Christian raised two potential issues in a recent KFD upstreaming code
review that are related to the KFD ioctl APIs:
1. behaviour of -ERESTARTSYS
2. transactional nature of KFD ioctl definitions, or lack thereof
I appreciate constructive feedback, but I also want to encourage an
open-
11 matches
Mail list logo
