On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:\
Why do you "need" drmOpen("omap")? Is it just a convention to use that
kind of name, instead of "omapdrm" style name?
>>>
>>> all of the /dev/dri/cardN get opened, and then DRM_IOCTL_VERSION ioctl
>>> to get th
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:\
Why do you "need" drmOpen("omap")? Is it just a convention to use that
kind of name, instead of "omapdrm" style name?
>>>
>>> all of the /dev/dri/cardN get opened, and then DRM_IOCTL_VERSION ioctl
>>> to get th
On 05/06/13 17:58, Rob Clark wrote:
> could be udev or something else was triggering the module to load?
> Not 100% sure offhand.
Well in my case I load them manually. But if there are applications out
there, that at the moment use drmOpen("omapdrm"), then the change would
break those apps.
>> W
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 17:58, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> could be udev or something else was triggering the module to load?
>> Not 100% sure offhand.
>
> Well in my case I load them manually. But if there are applications out
> there, that at the moment use
On 05/06/13 17:58, Rob Clark wrote:
> could be udev or something else was triggering the module to load?
> Not 100% sure offhand.
Well in my case I load them manually. But if there are applications out
there, that at the moment use drmOpen("omapdrm"), then the change would
break those apps.
>> W
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 17:58, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> could be udev or something else was triggering the module to load?
>> Not 100% sure offhand.
>
> Well in my case I load them manually. But if there are applications out
> there, that at the moment use
On 05/06/13 14:52, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>>> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
>>> need to rename the .ko
>>
>> Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omap
On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
> need to rename the .ko
Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omapdrm" just a
badly chosen name from the start? If drmOpen("omapdrm") works now,
doesn't changing the module nam
On 05/06/13 13:43, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
>> encountered.
>> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
>> problem,
>> so I hope th
Hi,
I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
encountered.
For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
problem,
so I hope that you may have some ideas.
dispc_runtime_get/put used in irq context
=
d
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 14:52, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>
1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
need to rename the .ko
On 05/06/13 14:52, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>>> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
>>> need to rename the .ko
>>
>> Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omapdrm
On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
> need to rename the .ko
Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omapdrm" just a
badly chosen name from the start? If drmOpen("omapdrm") works now,
doesn't changing the module nam
On 05/06/13 13:43, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
>> encountered.
>> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
>> problem,
>> so I hope that
Hi,
I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
encountered.
For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
problem,
so I hope that you may have some ideas.
dispc_runtime_get/put used in irq context
=
d
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 14:52, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>
1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
need to rename the .ko
>>>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
>> need to rename the .ko
>
> Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omapdrm" just a
> badly chosen name from the start?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
>> encountered.
>> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
>> problem,
>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
> encountered.
> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
> problem,
> so I hope that you may have some ideas.
>
>
> dispc_runtime_
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/06/13 13:57, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> 1) drmOpen("omap") will try to modprobe "omap", not "omapdrm" so we
>> need to rename the .ko
>
> Has something been changed that broke that? Or was "omapdrm" just a
> badly chosen name from the start?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
>> encountered.
>> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
>> problem,
>> s
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did some testing with omapdrm on v3.10-rc1. Here are some issues I
> encountered.
> For most of them I don't have any idea where to even start looking for a
> problem,
> so I hope that you may have some ideas.
>
>
> dispc_runtime_
22 matches
Mail list logo