On 23/08/16 11:57 AM, Reid Hekman wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 08:27 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 23/08/16 10:18 AM, Reid Hekman wrote:
>>>
>>> I was encouraged by a commit I saw today to add Sea Islands PCI ids to
>>> xf86-video-amdgpu. However I did not see MULLINS included. Are there
>>> other sho
On 23/08/16 10:18 AM, Reid Hekman wrote:
>
> I was encouraged by a commit I saw today to add Sea Islands PCI ids to
> xf86-video-amdgpu. However I did not see MULLINS included. Are there
> other showstoppers preventing inclusion?
I assume the commit you're referring to was the one adding the
*So
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Reid Hekman wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 08:27 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>
>> On 23/08/16 10:18 AM, Reid Hekman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I was encouraged by a commit I saw today to add Sea Islands PCI ids to
>>> xf86-video-amdgpu. However I did not see MULLINS included. Are
On 08/22/2016 08:27 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 23/08/16 10:18 AM, Reid Hekman wrote:
>>
>> I was encouraged by a commit I saw today to add Sea Islands PCI ids to
>> xf86-video-amdgpu. However I did not see MULLINS included. Are there
>> other showstoppers preventing inclusion?
>
> I assume the
Hi,
I was encouraged by a commit I saw today to add Sea Islands PCI ids to
xf86-video-amdgpu. However I did not see MULLINS included. Are there other
showstoppers preventing inclusion?
I have a Lenovo laptop that appears to have function drm/kms amdgpu support
for this APU.
Output of lspci -n -
