Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-05 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-05-04 10:20 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> > >> FWIW, for me EDID failure on new kernels is 100% reproducible, and there > >> are no such checksum errors in the log. ?It's just missing. > >> > >> > Just a crazy thought, but didn't we change some timings related to > >> > EDID retrieval? To

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-05 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-05-04 10:20 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> > >> FWIW, for me EDID failure on new kernels is 100% reproducible, and there > >> are no such checksum errors in the log.  It's just missing. > >> > >> > Just a crazy thought, but didn't we change some timings related to > >> > EDID retrieval? To

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-04 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 21:31 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Luca, Maarten, > > > > On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > > gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-04 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> FWIW, for me EDID failure on new kernels is 100% reproducible, and there >> are no such checksum errors in the log. ?It's just missing. >> >> > Just a crazy thought, but didn't we change some timings related to >> > EDID retrieval? To make it faster. >> >> OK, this time bisecting started off

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-04 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> FWIW, for me EDID failure on new kernels is 100% reproducible, and there >> are no such checksum errors in the log.  It's just missing. >> >> > Just a crazy thought, but didn't we change some timings related to >> > EDID retrieval? To make it faster. >> >> OK, this time bisecting started off

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-03 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 21:31 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Luca, Maarten, > > > > On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 201

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-02 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Luca, Maarten, > > On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > > > > > wrote: > > >> O

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-02 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Luca, Maarten, On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > >>> On 2012-04-28 0

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-02 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Luca, Maarten, > > On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > > > > > wrote: > > >> On Sat, A

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-02 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Luca, Maarten, On Monday 30 April 2012 01:01:30 pm Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > >>> On 2012-04-28 0

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
(re-adding Ben to the Cc because he was apparently dropped somewhere in this thread) On 2012-05-01 09:23 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-30 11:07 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400,

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
(re-adding Ben to the Cc because he was apparently dropped somewhere in this thread) On 2012-05-01 09:23 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-30 11:07 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400,

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 1 May 2012 11:31:23 -0400 Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-05-01 16:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > > > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > > > disk died halfway through... So I'll p

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Alan Cox
> OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > disk died halfway through... So I'll post the partial bisection results > now (11 commits left to test), but I clearly have other things to fix > befo

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-05-01 16:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > > disk died halfway through... So I'll post the partial bisection results > > now (11 commits left to t

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-30 11:07 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > >> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >> > elliptictec

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 1 May 2012 11:31:23 -0400 Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-05-01 16:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > > > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > > > disk died halfway through... So I'll p

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-05-01 16:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > > disk died halfway through... So I'll post the partial bisection results > > now (11 commits left to t

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Alan Cox
> OK, this time bisecting started off relatively smoothly (doing the same > "backwards" bisect on the branch-o-reverts as last time), but then my > disk died halfway through... So I'll post the partial bisection results > now (11 commits left to test), but I clearly have other things to fix > befo

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-30 11:07 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > >> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler > >> > wrote: >

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: >>> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >> > ellipt

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-30 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: >> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Ben, >> > > >> > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeg

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: >>> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >>> > wrot

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-30 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: >> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Ben, >> > > >> > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeg

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-29 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler > > wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > >> Does this patch help you at all? > > >> > > >> ht

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-29 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler > > wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > >> Does this patch help you at all? > > >> > > >> ht

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-28 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler > wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> Does this patch help you at all? > >> > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-28 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> Does this patch help you at all? > >> > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5ee8

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> Does this patch help you at all? >> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5ee85731ec1268305 > > Yes. ?I cherry-picked this patch on top of

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> Does this patch help you at all? >> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5ee85731ec1268305 > > Yes.  I cherry-picked this patch on top of

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-27 Thread Nick Bowler
Hi Ben, On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > Does this patch help you at all? > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5ee85731ec1268305 Yes. I cherry-picked this patch on top of Linus' master (3.4-rc4+) and this appears to solve the "black s

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-27 Thread Nick Bowler
Hi Ben, On 2012-04-27 15:20 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > Does this patch help you at all? > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=a3a285f17867f0018de798b5ee85731ec1268305 Yes. I cherry-picked this patch on top of Linus' master (3.4-rc4+) and this appears to solve the "black s

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-27 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:56 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:35 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > >

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-26 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:56 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:35 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > >

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-25 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:35 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the pan

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-24 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > > boot is this one: > > > > > > commit 8e7e7052

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-24 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:35 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the pan

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-24 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-23 21:03 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > > boot is this one: > > > > > > commit 8e7e7052

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-24 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:03:45PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > > boot is this one: > > > > > >

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-24 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:03:45PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > > boot is this one: > > > > > >

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > boot is this one: > > > > commit 8e7e70522d760c4ccd4cd370ebfa0ba69e006c6e > > Author: Jerome Glisse

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 22:45 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > Following up on the above, the commit which introduces the panics during > > boot is this one: > > > > commit 8e7e70522d760c4ccd4cd370ebfa0ba69e006c6e > > Author: Jerome Glisse

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-23 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 08:26 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > David & co, any ideas? > > I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, I unfortunately haven't yet had any ideas which could be useful aside from cont

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 12:40 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > > > really be worth trying again. Do a > > > > > > gi

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 18:40, Nick Bowler wrote: > (Aside: is there a way to run "git bisect skip" without causing a new > working tree to be immediately checked out? ?When I'm going to be > picking the next commit manually anyway, having git bisect checkout a > new tree arbitrarily, potentially

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 08:26 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > David & co, any ideas? > > I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, I unfortunately haven't yet had any ideas which could be useful aside from cont

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 12:40 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > > really be worth trying again. Do a > > > > git bisect visualize > > > > and try to pick a good commit (avoding the pr

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:05:54PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-22 12:40 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > > > really be worth trying again. Do a > > > > > > gi

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 12:40 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > > really be worth trying again. Do a > > > > git bisect visualize > > > > and try to pick a good commit (avoding the pr

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 08:26 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, > > It would be worth bisecting drivers/gpu/drm only, I doubt its going to > be outside that area. Since the original bisection was restricted to drivers/gpu, and there appear

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > really be worth trying again. Do a > > git bisect visualize > > and try to pick a good commit (avoding the problems you hit) when you > hit a problem, and then do > >

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 18:40, Nick Bowler wrote: > (Aside: is there a way to run "git bisect skip" without causing a new > working tree to be immediately checked out?  When I'm going to be > picking the next commit manually anyway, having git bisect checkout a > new tree arbitrarily, potentially

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-21 21:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might > really be worth trying again. Do a > > git bisect visualize > > and try to pick a good commit (avoding the problems you hit) when you > hit a problem, and then do > >

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-04-22 08:26 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, > > It would be worth bisecting drivers/gpu/drm only, I doubt its going to > be outside that area. Since the original bisection was restricted to drivers/gpu, and there appear

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > David & co, any ideas? I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, It would be worth bisecting drivers/gpu/drm only, I doubt its going to be outside that area. Dave.

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-22 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > David & co, any ideas? I've been asking Ben about this, I might have to use a bit more pressure, It would be worth bisecting drivers/gpu/drm only, I doubt its going to be outside that area. Dave. __

Re: Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
David & co, any ideas? There are other reports of problems with 3.3.x kernels, there's a report from Tim which may be related (also apparently working in 3.2, broken black screen in all 3.3.x). Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might really be worth trying again. D

Linux 3.4-rc4

2012-04-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
David & co, any ideas? There are other reports of problems with 3.3.x kernels, there's a report from Tim which may be related (also apparently working in 3.2, broken black screen in all 3.3.x). Nick, I realize you had trouble with a bisection already, but it might really be worth trying again. D