* Takashi Iwai -- Thursday 05 May 2011:
> Try the fixed patch below.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 456f404..4c6e187 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ typedef
* Takashi Iwai -- Thursday 05 May 2011:
> Try the fixed patch below.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 456f404..4c6e187 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ typedef
Hi Melchior,
於 一，2011-05-02 於 14:08 +0200，Takashi Iwai 提到：
> At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200,
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >
> > Dropping Linus from the CC.
> >
> >
> > * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > Yes, back
Hi Melchior,
? ??2011-05-02 ? 14:08 +0200?Takashi Iwai ???
> At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200,
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >
> > Dropping Linus from the CC.
> >
> >
> > * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > Yes, back
* Takashi Iwai -- Monday 02 May 2011:
* > At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > > acpi_osi quirk should be better added statically, then.
> >
> > No, I guess the problem here is that acer_wmi doesn't support this
> > machine yet
At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> Dropping Linus from the CC.
>
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > > with "acpi_os
* Takashi Iwai -- Monday 02 May 2011:
* > At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > > acpi_osi quirk should be better added statically, then.
> >
> > No, I guess the problem here is that acer_wmi doesn't support this
> > machine yet
At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:34:51 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> Dropping Linus from the CC.
>
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > > with "acpi_os
Hi Melchior,
於 六，2011-04-30 於 13:34 +0200，Melchior FRANZ 提到：
> Dropping Linus from the CC.
>
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > > with "acpi_
Dropping Linus from the CC.
* Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
* * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > with "acpi_osi=Linux" on the command line.
>
> acpi_osi quirk should be better added st
At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > I remember vaguely that the value zero could be interpreted as the max.
>
> > Also, with the patch, does the backlight level can be adjusted
> > correctly to different values? I wonder whe
* Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> I remember vaguely that the value zero could be interpreted as the max.
> Also, with the patch, does the backlight level can be adjusted
> correctly to different values? I wonder whether LBPC adjustment
> really works or not on your machine.
> +
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:09:54 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31522]
> > Looking at bugzilla, the problem seems like the case lbpc=0.
> > What about the patch below instead?
>
> > - val *= lbp
Hi Melchior,
? ??2011-04-30 ? 13:34 +0200?Melchior FRANZ ???
> Dropping Linus from the CC.
>
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> * * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > > with "acpi_
Dropping Linus from the CC.
* Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
* * At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > Yes, backlight adjustment generally works on this notebook, but only
> > with "acpi_osi=Linux" on the command line.
>
> acpi_osi quirk should be better added st
At Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:32:04 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> > I remember vaguely that the value zero could be interpreted as the max.
>
> > Also, with the patch, does the backlight level can be adjusted
> > correctly to different values? I wonder whe
* Takashi Iwai -- Saturday 30 April 2011:
> I remember vaguely that the value zero could be interpreted as the max.
> Also, with the patch, does the backlight level can be adjusted
> correctly to different values? I wonder whether LBPC adjustment
> really works or not on your machine.
> +
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:09:54 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31522]
> > Looking at bugzilla, the problem seems like the case lbpc=0.
> > What about the patch below instead?
>
> > - val *= lbp
* Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
[https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31522]
> Looking at bugzilla, the problem seems like the case lbpc=0.
> What about the patch below instead?
> - val *= lbpc;
> + if (lbpc)
> + va
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:41:53 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > The bug was introduced with commit
> > > ba3820ade317ee36e496b9b40d2ec3987dd4aef0
> > > [...] when using KMS my notebook's[2] screen remains dark, because the
> >
* Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > The bug was introduced with commit ba3820ade317ee36e496b9b40d2ec3987dd4aef0
> > [...] when using KMS my notebook's[2] screen remains dark, because the
> > backlight isn't turned on.
> Could you check whether the patch below change
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:58:06 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds -- Wednesday 27 April 2011:
> > Go forth and test,
>
> Doesn't work on my notebook with i915/KMS. But then again, neither did
> 2.6.38 or any of its stable releases. The last working version was
> 2.6.38-rc8. The probl
* Linus Torvalds -- Wednesday 27 April 2011:
> Go forth and test,
Doesn't work on my notebook with i915/KMS. But then again, neither did
2.6.38 or any of its stable releases. The last working version was
2.6.38-rc8. The problem has been reported[1], but the bug got closed
in the wrong assumption t
* Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
[https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31522]
> Looking at bugzilla, the problem seems like the case lbpc=0.
> What about the patch below instead?
> - val *= lbpc;
> + if (lbpc)
> + va
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:41:53 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > The bug was introduced with commit
> > > ba3820ade317ee36e496b9b40d2ec3987dd4aef0
> > > [...] when using KMS my notebook's[2] screen remains dark, because the
> >
* Takashi Iwai -- Friday 29 April 2011:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > The bug was introduced with commit ba3820ade317ee36e496b9b40d2ec3987dd4aef0
> > [...] when using KMS my notebook's[2] screen remains dark, because the
> > backlight isn't turned on.
> Could you check whether the patch below change
At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:58:06 +0200,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds -- Wednesday 27 April 2011:
> > Go forth and test,
>
> Doesn't work on my notebook with i915/KMS. But then again, neither did
> 2.6.38 or any of its stable releases. The last working version was
> 2.6.38-rc8. The probl
* Linus Torvalds -- Wednesday 27 April 2011:
> Go forth and test,
Doesn't work on my notebook with i915/KMS. But then again, neither did
2.6.38 or any of its stable releases. The last working version was
2.6.38-rc8. The problem has been reported[1], but the bug got closed
in the wrong assumption t
28 matches
Mail list logo
