On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:52:13AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> Culprit likely d1e3b5564834ea24dee6b364a172365f64865fe5 try reverting that
> >> one.
> > Confirmed as the buggy commit via bisect.
> > Then reverted in 3.12 and 3.12 suddenly works.
> I'm not sure how you would even be hitting thos
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:52:13AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >> Culprit likely d1e3b5564834ea24dee6b364a172365f64865fe5 try reverting
> that one.
> > > Confirmed as the buggy commit via bisect.
> > > Then reverted in 3.12 and 3.12 sud
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:37:11PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -05
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:37:11PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, R
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:43:45PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> > > wrote:
> > > > (Resending to dri-devel
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:37:11PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> > > wrote:
> > > > (Resending to dri-devel
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> wrote:
> > (Resending to dri-devel because the first one didn't make it).
> >
> > I apologize for not sending this sooner, but I wanted to be really sure
> > that I
> > wasn't intr
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> > wrote:
> > > (Resending to dri-devel because the first one didn't make it).
> > >
> > > I apologize for not s
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:48:55PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> > wrote:
> > > (Resending to dri-devel because the first one didn't make it).
> > >
> > > I apologize for not s
(Resending to dri-devel because the first one didn't make it).
I apologize for not sending this sooner, but I wanted to be really sure that I
wasn't introducing the bug elsewhere, and I was lacking time to even narrow it
down this far.
TL;DR:
3.11 kernel does proper modeset for dual 1920x1200 out
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> (Resending to dri-devel because the first one didn't make it).
>
> I apologize for not sending this sooner, but I wanted to be really sure that I
> wasn't introducing the bug elsewhere, and I was lacking time to even narrow it
> down this
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I apologize for not sending this sooner, but I wanted to be really sure that I
> wasn't introducing the bug elsewhere, and I was lacking time to even narrow it
> down this far.
>
> TL;DR:
> 3.11 kernel does proper modeset for dual 1920x1200
12 matches
Mail list logo
