Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 19:34, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian K?nig > wrote: >> On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: > 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig >> wrote: >>> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig > wrote: >> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig >>> wrote: Hi Dave, there still seems to be the need for some further discussion a

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/5/3 Christian K?nig : > On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig >>> ?wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian > K?nig > ?wrot

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig >>> ?wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Chr

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse : >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig >> wrote: >>> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig ?wrote: > > On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse : > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig > wrote: >> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig >>> ?wrote: On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Chri

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig >> ?wrote: >>> >>> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig ?wrote: > >

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig >> ?wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA >>> code, >>> so I again split tha

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 19:34, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian König wrote: On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/5/3 Christian König : > On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König >>>  wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian > König >  wrot

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian König wrote: > On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König >>>  wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Chri

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 19:20, Alex Deucher wrote: 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König wrote: On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König wrote: On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse : > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König > wrote: >> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König >>>  wrote: On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Chri

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > 2012/5/3 Jerome Glisse : >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König >> wrote: >>> On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König  wrote: > > On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig > wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA >> code, >> so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. >> >> Most of the st

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Christian König wrote: > On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König  wrote: > >

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 18:32, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König wrote: On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code, so I ag

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Christian König wrote: > On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA >>> code, >>> so I again split that

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Dave Airlie
> > there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA > code, > so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. > > Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to > avoid > mailing around unrelated and already reviewed pa

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Dave Airlie
> > there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA > code, > so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. > > Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to > avoid > mailing around unrelated and already reviewed pa

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-03 Thread Christian König
On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König wrote: Hi Dave, there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code, so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. Most of the stuff still works fine w

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-02 Thread Christian König
Hi Dave, there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code, so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to avoid mailing around unrelated and already reviewed patches, I

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-02 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian K?nig wrote: > Hi Dave, > > there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA > code, > so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. > > Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes,

Include request for reset-rework branch v4 PART2

2012-05-02 Thread j.gli...@gmail.com
So here are sa improvement, ib pool cleanup and semaphore cleanup. Those are Christian patches rebased on top of its last 17 patchset and on top of sa allocator change. The idea is that the sa_bo struct is not free until associated fence is signaled. Meanwhile the ib structure or the semaphore/fen

Re: Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-02 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian König wrote: > Hi Dave, > > there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA > code, > so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. > > Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes,

Include request for reset-rework branch v4 PART2

2012-05-02 Thread j . glisse
So here are sa improvement, ib pool cleanup and semaphore cleanup. Those are Christian patches rebased on top of its last 17 patchset and on top of sa allocator change. The idea is that the sa_bo struct is not free until associated fence is signaled. Meanwhile the ib structure or the semaphore/fen

Include request for reset-rework branch v4

2012-05-02 Thread Christian König
Hi Dave, there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code, so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit. Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to avoid mailing around unrelated and already reviewed patches, I