Hi Thomas
I'm really sorry for the delay of 2 weeks (I lost a big raid array and
it tooks days++ to recover, sorry)
As asked, I did patch linux-6.13.1 with the provided patch and I did use
the original (but just patched) ast driver
Here you can find the video of the test:
https://xba.soartis
Hi Thomas
Great. You'll find a patch attached against the 6.13 kernel. Let me
know if it doesn't apply.
If it applies, please run your performance test and look at the dmesg
output. It should contain warnings about shared GEM objects. Can you
please report some of this output?
Thanks a lot
(cc'ing Jocelyn)
Am 03.03.25 um 09:44 schrieb Nicolas Baranger:
Hi Thomas
I do have an idea what might be happening here. You are using 6.13.1,
right? If I give you a patch file for this kernel, are you able to
apply it (with 'git am') for testing and report the kernel's logging
output?
Y
Hi Thomas
I do have an idea what might be happening here. You are using 6.13.1,
right? If I give you a patch file for this kernel, are you able to
apply it (with 'git am') for testing and report the kernel's logging
output?
Yes I'm using Linux 6.13.1 but I can also test with the latest
lin
Hi
Am 03.03.25 um 09:07 schrieb Nicolas Baranger:
Dear Thomas
You are using NVidia's proprietary driver, right? Did you reach out
to them wrt this problem? Or searched their support forums, online
help, etc? If so, what are the results?
Yes I'm using NVidia propriétary driver.
Maybe I'm wro
Dear Thomas
You are using NVidia's proprietary driver, right? Did you reach out to
them wrt this problem? Or searched their support forums, online help,
etc? If so, what are the results?
Yes I'm using NVidia propriétary driver.
Maybe I'm wrong but I did not ask their support directly because
Hi
Am 11.02.25 um 19:15 schrieb Nicolas Baranger:
Dear maintener
For my own usage, I did make work the ASPEED ast-drm 1.15.1 video
driver on mainline kernel (6.13.0 + 6.13.1).
ASPEED video driver is availiable here:
https://www.aspeedtech.com/file/support/Linux_DRM_1.15.1_4.tar.gz
But it on
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Nicolas Baranger wrote:
> Yes, due to .date total removal in linux 6.14
> (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cb2e1c2136f71618142557ceca3a8802e87a44cd)
>
> the last DKMS sources are :
> https://xba.soartist.net/ast-drm_nba_20250211/nba-dkms/nba_last_src_20250212/src/
Hi Jani
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. The driver date was
removed
because it was virtually never updated for any driver. It provided no
useful information.
Sure your right, when I removed it from NVIDIA driver (to be able to
build nvidia driver with DKMS on mainline), the .dat
Dear Thomas, Jocelyn
Sorry for my late answer and thanks again for help
Linux 6.1.128 is working fine out of the box.
I think Jocelyn was true and a first regression was introduce in Linux
6.2 but I suspect it's not the only one between 6.1.128 and mainline
Please see video here
https://xba.s
Dear Thomas
Thanks for answer and help
All these errors don't look as if they are directly related to ast.
It's something in the DRM core or Xorg.
Yes it's Xorg DRM issue
That's btrfs AFAICS; so not related to ast
That was not BTRFS, it was ACPI / PCIE (sure not related to ast) but as
I
Hi
Am 14.02.25 um 18:52 schrieb Nicolas Baranger:
Hi Thomas, Jocelyn
Same error with linux-6.1.124 debian package ...
It's reported in log as a drm bug by kernel:
[ cut here ]
BUG: the value to copy was not set!
WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 6163 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:
Hi Thomas, Jocelyn
Same error with linux-6.1.124 debian package ...
It's reported in log as a drm bug by kernel:
[ cut here ]
BUG: the value to copy was not set!
WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 6163 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:478
drm_copy_field+0xa2/0xb0 [drm]
This server ha
Hi Thomas, Jocelyn
Starting with 6.1.128 longterm kernel failed and it seems to be a 'drm
error'
Xorg error :
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Feb 14 17:32:59 2025
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
(==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen se
ger
Message d'origine
De : Jocelyn Falempe
Date : 14/02/2025 10:11 (GMT+01:00)
À : Nicolas Baranger , Thomas Zimmermann
Cc : dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airl...@redhat.com, Maarten
Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard
, David Airlie , Simona Vetter
, linux-ker...@vger.kernel
Hi Thomas
Thanks again for help
Nicolas, if you find an old kernel version that works correctly, and if
you know how to git-bisect the kernel, it would be helpful if you could
bisect to the commit that introduced the problem.
Ok, I will try to find a working kernel and to git bisect to fin
sktop.org, airl...@redhat.com, Maarten
Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard
, David Airlie , Simona Vetter
, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Objet : Re: Include ASPEED ast-drm 1.15.1 video driver in kernel tree
On 13/02/2025 10:27, Nicolas Baranger wrote:
> Dear Thomas
>
> Thanks for answer and h
Hi Jocelyn
Am 14.02.25 um 10:11 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
On 13/02/2025 10:27, Nicolas Baranger wrote:
Dear Thomas
Thanks for answer and help.
Yes, due to .date total removal in linux 6.14 (https://github.com/
torvalds/linux/commit/cb2e1c2136f71618142557ceca3a8802e87a44cd
cb2e1c2136f71618142
, David
Airlie , Simona Vetter ,
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Objet : Re: Include ASPEED ast-drm 1.15.1 video
driver in kernel tree On 13/02/2025 10:27, Nicolas Baranger wrote:> Dear
Thomas> > Thanks for answer and help.> > Yes, due to .date total removal
On 13/02/2025 10:27, Nicolas Baranger wrote:
Dear Thomas
Thanks for answer and help.
Yes, due to .date total removal in linux 6.14 (https://github.com/
torvalds/linux/commit/cb2e1c2136f71618142557ceca3a8802e87a44cd github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/
cb2e1c2136f71618142557ceca3a8802e87a44cd>) t
Sorry for the noise, html was rejected by linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
so resending this mail in plain text
Regards
Nicolas
Le 2025-02-13 10:27, Nicolas Baranger a écrit :
Dear Thomas
Thanks for answer and help.
Yes, due to .date total removal in linux 6.14
(https://github.com/torvalds/lin
Dear Thomas
Thanks for answer and help.
Yes, due to .date total removal in linux 6.14
(https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cb2e1c2136f71618142557ceca3a8802e87a44cd)
the last DKMS sources are :
https://xba.soartist.net/ast-drm_nba_20250211/nba-dkms/nba_last_src_20250212/src/
You can al
Hi Nicolas
Am 12.02.25 um 19:58 schrieb Nicolas Baranger:
Dear maintener
That's mostly me and Jocelyn.
I did include ast-drm driver version 1.15.1 (in replacement of version
0.1.0) on the new mainline kernel too (6.14.0-rc2) and I issue a new
dkms patch
Last DKMS patch had been sucessfu
Hello Nicolas,
Thank you for taking a look at this. It would be nice to have an updated
driver. The best way to go forward is to chop the enhancements from the
version that you tested into small patches that can be applied to the
kernel tree.
This way you get all the benefits from the update
Dear maintener
I did include ast-drm driver version 1.15.1 (in replacement of version
0.1.0) on the new mainline kernel too (6.14.0-rc2) and I issue a new
dkms patch
Last DKMS patch had been sucessfully tested on mainline.
And last ast.ko version 1.15.1 included in linux tree had also been
Dear maintener
For my own usage, I did make work the ASPEED ast-drm 1.15.1 video driver
on mainline kernel (6.13.0 + 6.13.1).
ASPEED video driver is availiable here:
https://www.aspeedtech.com/file/support/Linux_DRM_1.15.1_4.tar.gz
But it only work for LTS kernel
So I modify the DKMS packag
26 matches
Mail list logo
