On Friday 3 February 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Simon Farnsworth
> wrote:
> > As I've got the fix I need (Mesa-dev message "[PATCH] r600g: Use a fake
> > reloc to sleep for fences"), I can't really justify continuing to work on
> > this, so I'm putting out what I'v
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Simon Farnsworth
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run out of time to work on this, as I have a fix (the unused BO trick)
> that's good enough for my needs. I've taken Christian's patches (1 and 2 of
> this series) and added the obvious ioctl interface on top, enabling
> use
Hello,
I've run out of time to work on this, as I have a fix (the unused BO trick)
that's good enough for my needs. I've taken Christian's patches (1 and 2 of
this series) and added the obvious ioctl interface on top, enabling
userspace to wait for a kernel fence *if* the kernel gives it some opaq
On Friday 3 February 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Simon Farnsworth
> wrote:
> > As I've got the fix I need (Mesa-dev message "[PATCH] r600g: Use a fake
> > reloc to sleep for fences"), I can't really justify continuing to work on
> > this, so I'm putting out what I'v
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Simon Farnsworth
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run out of time to work on this, as I have a fix (the unused BO trick)
> that's good enough for my needs. I've taken Christian's patches (1 and 2 of
> this series) and added the obvious ioctl interface on top, enabling
> use
Hello,
I've run out of time to work on this, as I have a fix (the unused BO trick)
that's good enough for my needs. I've taken Christian's patches (1 and 2 of
this series) and added the obvious ioctl interface on top, enabling
userspace to wait for a kernel fence *if* the kernel gives it some opaq
