On 23.05.2012 19:02, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse
wrote:
> On Wed, May 2
On 23.05.2012 19:02, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
>>> wrote:
On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Thu,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
> wrote:
>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ?wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the
On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>> probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
>> de
On 05/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>>> probabl
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse
>>> wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
On 05/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
probably be usefull
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
>> wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ?wrote:
>
> So here is improve
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
> wrote:
>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ?wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ?wrote:
>>>
>>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>>> p
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ? wrote:
>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>> probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ?wrote:
>>>
>>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>>> p
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
> probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
> debugfs file stuff.
>
> The lockup dumping publ
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
wrote:
>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
>>> wrote:
On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Thu,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>
> So here is improve
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>>> p
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>> probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
>>> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
>>> p
On 23.05.2012 11:27, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
debugfs file
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
> So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
> for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
> probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
> debugfs file stuff.
>
> The lockup dumping publ
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:07 PM, wrote:
> Ok this time is final version, i added a bunch of flags to cmd buffer
> to make the userspace tools life easier.
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
So updated libdrm patch :
http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/lockup/0001-radeon-add-rati-dumping-helper.patch
Also
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:07 PM, wrote:
> Ok this time is final version, i added a bunch of flags to cmd buffer
> to make the userspace tools life easier.
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
So updated libdrm patch :
http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/lockup/0001-radeon-add-rati-dumping-helper.patch
Also
Ok this time is final version, i added a bunch of flags to cmd buffer
to make the userspace tools life easier.
Cheers,
Jerome
Make the format more future proof reliable by adding a total chunk
size field that allow old userspace to skip over potentialy new
chunk. Not sure this is really needed but hey.
Jerome
Ok this time is final version, i added a bunch of flags to cmd buffer
to make the userspace tools life easier.
Cheers,
Jerome
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
debugfs file stuff.
The lockup dumping public api have been move into radeon_drm.h
Stressing th
Make the format more future proof reliable by adding a total chunk
size field that allow old userspace to skip over potentialy new
chunk. Not sure this is really needed but hey.
Jerome
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lis
So here is improved patchset, where i splited ground work necessary
for the dumping into their own patch. The debugfs improvement could
probably be usefull to intel instead of having i915 have it's own
debugfs file stuff.
The lockup dumping public api have been move into radeon_drm.h
Stressing th
32 matches
Mail list logo