> On 07.05.2012 17:23, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian K?nig
>> ?wrote:
>>>
>>> A startover with a new idea for a multiple ring allocator.
>>> Should perform as well as a normal ring allocator as long
>>> as only one ring does somthing, but falls back to a more
> On 07.05.2012 17:23, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian König
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A startover with a new idea for a multiple ring allocator.
>>> Should perform as well as a normal ring allocator as long
>>> as only one ring does somthing, but falls back to a more