On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:37:09 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 00:06, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
> > Olaf Freyer wrote:
> >
> >> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> >>> Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
> >>>
> >>>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:37:09 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 00:06, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
> > Olaf Freyer wrote:
> >
> >> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> >>> Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
> >>>
> >>>
Am 29.06.2011 00:06, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
>
>> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
>>> Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
>>>
>>> The patch you reverted will definitely cause the GPU to ramp up its
>>>
Am 29.06.2011 00:06, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
>
>> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
>>> Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
>>>
>>> The patch you reverted will definitely cause the GPU to ramp up its
>>>
Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
> I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that commit makes
> things disappear?
It seems like you guessed
Am 28.06.2011 22:59, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:46:41 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
>
>> Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
that
resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm u
Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
> I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that commit makes
> things disappear?
It seems like you guessed
Am 28.06.2011 22:59, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:46:41 +0200
> Olaf Freyer wrote:
>
>> Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
that
resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm u
Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
>> Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
>> that
>> resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm using a Intel(R) Core(TM)
>> i7-2720QM with some Intel Sandybridge Chipset graphics those might sound
>> somewhat
Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
>> Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
>> that
>> resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm using a Intel(R) Core(TM)
>> i7-2720QM with some Intel Sandybridge Chipset graphics those might sound
>> somewhat
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
> > Olaf Freyer wrote:
> > I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> > cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that com
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:01:58 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 28.06.2011 23:18, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
> > Olaf Freyer wrote:
> > I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> > cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that com
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> >>> I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> >>> cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that commit makes
> >>> things disappear?
> >> It seems like you guessed perfectly correct - reverting the commit makes
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> >>> I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> >>> cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that commit makes
> >>> things disappear?
> >> It seems like you guessed perfectly correct - reverting the commit makes
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:46:41 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
> >> Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
> >> that
> >> resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm using a Intel(R) Core(TM)
> >> i7-2720QM with some
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:46:41 +0200
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Am 26.06.2011 18:27, schrieb Florian Mickler:
> >> Both of my bisection attempts ended near the same set of drm/i915 changes
> >> that
> >> resulted in non-bootable kernels. Considering I'm using a Intel(R) Core(TM)
> >> i7-2720QM with some
On Wed, 25 May 2011 15:40:24 + (UTC)
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to git-bisect to find the root cause of this issue, but feel somewhat
> lost after spending two evening without any usefull results.
>
> I started with v2.6.38 as last known good and v2.6.39-rc1 as first known bad
> v
On Wed, 25 May 2011 15:40:24 + (UTC)
Olaf Freyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to git-bisect to find the root cause of this issue, but feel somewhat
> lost after spending two evening without any usefull results.
>
> I started with v2.6.38 as last known good and v2.6.39-rc1 as first known bad
> v
18 matches
Mail list logo
