On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:51:05 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
>> > Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton > > linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
>> Chris Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton > > linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> > > No
Hello Andrew,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput > at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error an
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I'd rather we just backout the hangcheck stuff touching copies at all
> at this point, and try again doing it properly with a slow work or
> something for later.
Hello Chris,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
>> getting XWindows :
>
> [snip]
>
> Hmm, there are still patches for
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton > linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> > > it hardwir
Hello,
With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
getting XWindows :
[ 45.269075] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
elapsed... GPU hung
[ 45.269111] [ cut here ]
[ 45.269139] WARNING: at mm/highmem.c:453 debug_kmap_atomic+0xa9
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton wrote:
> No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> it hardwires use of KM_USER0. I suggest that io_mapping_create_wc(),
> io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() etc be changed so that the caller passes in the
> KM_foo kmap slot i
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:48:18 -0400, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput > at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and
On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
> getting XWindows :
[snip]
Hmm, there are still patches for capturing error state that haven't gone
upstream, shame on me.
That error is a secondary
On Wed, 12 May 2010 09:17:09 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> and
> >> >> this codepath is called from non-irq contexts just as much as irq
> >> >> contexts.
> >> >
> >> > That's fine. __As long as we do a local_irq_disable(), KM_IRQ0 can be
> >> > used from both irq- and non-irq contexts. __All
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:51:05 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
> > Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Mo
On Wed, 12 May 2010 09:17:09 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> and
> >> >> this codepath is called from non-irq contexts just as much as irq
> >> >> contexts.
> >> >
> >> > That's fine. __As long as we do a local_irq_disable(), KM_IRQ0 can be
> >> > used from both irq- and non-irq contexts. __All
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:51:05 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
>> > Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:51:05 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
> > Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
>> >> Chris
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
> >> Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, And
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I'd rather we just backout the hangcheck stuff touching copies at all
> at this point, and try again doing it properly with a slow work or
> something for later.
>From my point of view, the information provided by the hangcheck has been
inv
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:22:49 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton > linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
> >> Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 11 May 2010
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
>> Chris Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton
>> > wrote:
>> > > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton
> > wrote:
> > > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> > > it hardwires use of KM_USER0
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> > it hardwires use of KM_USER0. I suggest that io_mapping_create_wc(),
> > io_mapping_map_atomic_wc()
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> > it hardwires use of KM_USER0. I suggest that io_mapping_create_wc(),
> > io_mappi
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context:
> it hardwires use of KM_USER0. I suggest that io_mapping_create_wc(),
> io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() etc be changed so that the caller passes in the
> KM_foo kmap slot
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:19:26 +0100 Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:48:18 -0400, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:19:26 +0100 Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:48:18 -0400, Andrew Morton linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson > chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
>
Hello Andrew,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
>> >
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:48:18 -0400, Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
> > >
On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
> > getting XWindows :
>
> [snip]
>
> Hmm, there are still patches for capturing e
Hello Chris,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
>> getting XWindows :
>
> [snip]
>
> Hmm, there are still patches for capturin
On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:10:53 +0100 Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
> > getting XWindows :
>
> [snip]
>
> Hmm, there are still patches for cap
On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:30:07 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
> getting XWindows :
[snip]
Hmm, there are still patches for capturing error state that haven't gone
upstream, shame on me.
That error is a secondary
Hello,
With latest git kernel, I am getting following DRM error and not
getting XWindows :
[ 45.269075] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
elapsed... GPU hung
[ 45.269111] [ cut here ]
[ 45.269139] WARNING: at mm/highmem.c:453 debug_kmap_atomic+0xa9
34 matches
Mail list logo