Re: [Intel-gfx] Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 16:32, Christian König wrote: > > Am 23.03.22 um 16:24 schrieb Daniel Stone: > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 15:14, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:04 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > >>> That's not what anyone's saying here ... > >>> > >>> No-one's demanding AMD pu

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

Am 23.03.22 um 16:24 schrieb Daniel Stone: On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 15:14, Alex Deucher wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:04 AM Daniel Stone wrote: That's not what anyone's saying here ... No-one's demanding AMD publish RTL, or internal design docs, or hardware specs, or URLs to JIRA tickets n

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 15:14, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:04 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > > That's not what anyone's saying here ... > > > > No-one's demanding AMD publish RTL, or internal design docs, or > > hardware specs, or URLs to JIRA tickets no-one can access. > > > > This

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

Am 23.03.22 um 15:00 schrieb Daniel Stone: On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian König wrote: Am 23.03.22 um 09:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: Sorry, I disagree. The motivation needs to be part of the commit message. For example see recent discussion on the LWN article *Donenfeld: Random number gen

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:04 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 14:42, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian König > > > wrote: > > > > Well the key point is it's not about you to

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

Hi Alex, On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 14:42, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian König > > wrote: > > > Well the key point is it's not about you to judge that. > > > > > > If you want to complain about the commit mess

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian König > wrote: > > Am 23.03.22 um 09:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > > Sorry, I disagree. The motivation needs to be part of the commit > > > message. For example see recent discussion on the LWN article

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Christian König wrote: > Am 23.03.22 um 09:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > Sorry, I disagree. The motivation needs to be part of the commit > > message. For example see recent discussion on the LWN article > > *Donenfeld: Random number generator enhancements for Linux 5.1

Re: Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

Hi Paul, Am 23.03.22 um 09:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: Dear Christian, Am 23.03.22 um 08:42 schrieb Christian König: Am 23.03.22 um 07:42 schrieb Paul Menzel: Am 23.03.22 um 07:25 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam: - Remove drm_mm references and replace with drm buddy functionalities The co

Commit messages (was: [PATCH v11] drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu)

Dear Christian, Am 23.03.22 um 08:42 schrieb Christian König: Am 23.03.22 um 07:42 schrieb Paul Menzel: Am 23.03.22 um 07:25 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam: - Remove drm_mm references and replace with drm buddy functionalities The commit message summary to me suggested, you can somehow