2014-02-21 16:12 keltez?ssel, Alex Deucher ?rta:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> [zozo at localhost ~]$ DRI_PRIME=1 glxgears
>> Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
>> approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
>> 5589 fram
2014-02-21 15:32 keltez?ssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan ?rta:
> 2014-02-21 14:37 keltez?ssel, Alex Deucher ?rta:
>>
>> Does the attached patch help?
>>
>> Alex
>
> Yes, it helped, thank you very much.
> The compressed Xorg.0.log is attached as proof.
>
> To others: the patch is against xf86-video-ati.
>
>
2014-02-21 14:37 keltez?ssel, Alex Deucher ?rta:
>
> Does the attached patch help?
>
> Alex
Yes, it helped, thank you very much.
The compressed Xorg.0.log is attached as proof.
To others: the patch is against xf86-video-ati.
Two notes, though:
1. Is it normal that "xrandr --listproviders" lists
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Don, 2014-02-20 at 08:44 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> 2014-02-20 06:47 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>> > On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> >> 2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>> >>
On Don, 2014-02-20 at 08:44 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2014-02-20 06:47 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> > On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> >> 2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> >>> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2014-02-21 14:37 keltez?ssel, Alex Deucher ?rta:
>
>>
>> Does the attached patch help?
>>
>> Alex
>
>
> Yes, it helped, thank you very much.
> The compressed Xorg.0.log is attached as proof.
>
> To others: the patch is against xf86-video
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>> On Don, 2014-02-20 at 08:44 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> 2014-02-20 06:47 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>>> > On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>>
On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> > On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> >> 2014-02-19 10:59 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> >>> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2014-02-19 10:59 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> > On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> >
> >> Can Mesa/Xorg use both r600g and radeonsi at the same time?
> > Yes, that seems to work fine for others. You may
2014-02-20 08:44 keltez?ssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan ?rta:
> 2014-02-20 06:47 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>> On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> 2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 20
2014-02-20 06:47 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> On Don, 2014-02-20 at 06:09 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> 2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>>> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2014-02-19 10:59 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> On Mit,
2014-02-20 04:20 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 11:56 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> 2014-02-19 10:59 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
>>> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>>
Can Mesa/Xorg use both r600g and radeonsi at the same time?
On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
> On second thought, the usage of VESA for installation and then
> switching to KMS might have caused the mixed behaviour, i.e. that
> the kernel recognized and initialized both chips but X used only the
> integrated one. But I don't w
2014-02-19 10:59 keltez?ssel, Michel D?nzer ?rta:
> On Mit, 2014-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> On second thought, the usage of VESA for installation and then
>> switching to KMS might have caused the mixed behaviour, i.e. that
>> the kernel recognized and initialized both chips
Hi,
I just got a Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E545 notebook and
I have installed Fedora 20/x86_64.
The CPU is Richland A10-5750 (contains ARUBA graphics)
and there is also a discrete HAINAN chip with 2GB dedicated
memory on the mainboard.
The problems started during installation, it looked like the mach
15 matches
Mail list logo
