On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [NOTE:
> We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
>
> but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
> but also because
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [NOTE:
> > We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
> >
> > but there are no reports linke
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [NOTE:
> > We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
> >
> > but there are no reports linke
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [NOTE:
> We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
>
> but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
> but also because
[NOTE:
We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low
recently. So, if you're se
[NOTE:
We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low
recently. So, if you're se