On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>>
>>> It now comes back at resume time.
>>
>> So that patch helped?
>
> I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it
On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
It now comes back at resume time.
So that patch helped?
I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does.
But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35) doing
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>>
>>> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
>>> regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (an
On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
back many years). As a result, I'm stuck with 2.6.35 f
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> > Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> > Submitter : Nikola Ciprich
> > Date
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord ?wrote:
>>
>>> It now comes back at resume time.
>>
>> So that patch helped?
>
> I think so. ?It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it
On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> It now comes back at resume time.
>
> So that patch helped?
I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does.
>> But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35)
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord ?wrote:
>>
>>> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
>>> regression with 2.6.36. ?But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (an
On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
>> regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
>> back many years). As a result, I'm stuck with
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> > Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> > Submitter : Nikola Ciprich
> > Date
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced
>> before
>> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
>> team.
>> If any of them have b
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced
>> before
>> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
>> team.
>> If any of them have b
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us kno
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unre
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
> team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> Submitter : Nikola Ciprich
> Date : 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old)
> Message-ID : <2
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> Submitter ? ? ? : Nikola Ciprich
> Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old)
> Message-ID ? ? ?: <2
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us kno
18 matches
Mail list logo
