-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-09-11 Thread Ian Pilcher
Ping On 09/04/2012 09:02 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> >> * Remove EDID_QUIRK_NO_AUDIO from the flags for the LG L246WP. It won't >> work "out of the box" with the Intel driver until that driver is >> fixed to not send audio InfoFrames to non-HDMI disp

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-09-11 Thread Ian Pilcher
Ping On 09/04/2012 09:02 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> >> * Remove EDID_QUIRK_NO_AUDIO from the flags for the LG L246WP. It won't >> work "out of the box" with the Intel driver until that driver is >> fixed to not send audio InfoFrames to non-HDMI disp

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-09-04 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > * Remove EDID_QUIRK_NO_AUDIO from the flags for the LG L246WP. It won't > work "out of the box" with the Intel driver until that driver is > fixed to not send audio InfoFrames to non-HDMI displays (but anyone > who has the combination will be a

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-09-04 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > * Remove EDID_QUIRK_NO_AUDIO from the flags for the LG L246WP. It won't > work "out of the box" with the Intel driver until that driver is > fixed to not send audio InfoFrames to non-HDMI displays (but anyone > who has the combination will be a

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:23:43AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/29/2012 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > So to me, that says that drivers need to ask _both_ whether the monitor > > supports audio and whether it's HDMI before sending HDMI-specific audio > > signalling. > > OK, so the burden i

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:23:43AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/29/2012 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > So to me, that says that drivers need to ask _both_ whether the monitor > > supports audio and whether it's HDMI before sending HDMI-specific audio > > signalling. > > OK, so the burden i

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-30 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/29/2012 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > So to me, that says that drivers need to ask _both_ whether the monitor > supports audio and whether it's HDMI before sending HDMI-specific audio > signalling. OK, so the burden is on the individual drivers. In terms of moving forward with the rest of

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/29/2012 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > So to me, that says that drivers need to ask _both_ whether the monitor > supports audio and whether it's HDMI before sending HDMI-specific audio > signalling. OK, so the burden is on the individual drivers. In terms of moving forward with the rest of

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/29/12 3:53 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Thinking a bit more about this, I'm starting to rethink my assertion > that the Intel driver is at fault here. On one hand, it doesn't make > any sense to send audio InfoFrames to a non-HDMI display. (BTW, I'm > assuming that a display with a DisplayPort

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/29/2012 02:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Wrt intel infoframes issues: Have you retested on latest 3.6-rc kernels? > We've fixed quite a few bugs for our infoframe support recently ... Tested just now. The behavior has changed. I now need to use *both* flags to make my display work with an

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/29/12 3:53 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: Thinking a bit more about this, I'm starting to rethink my assertion that the Intel driver is at fault here. On one hand, it doesn't make any sense to send audio InfoFrames to a non-HDMI display. (BTW, I'm assuming that a display with a DisplayPort port w

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/29/2012 02:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: Wrt intel infoframes issues: Have you retested on latest 3.6-rc kernels? We've fixed quite a few bugs for our infoframe support recently ... Tested just now. The behavior has changed. I now need to use *both* flags to make my display work with an I

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:18:24PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/28/2012 07:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> Actually, I believe that the error is probably in the Intel driver. As > >> I understand it, it shouldn't be sending audio InfoFrames to a non-

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:18:24PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/28/2012 07:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> Actually, I believe that the error is probably in the Intel driver. As > >> I understand it, it shouldn't be sending audio InfoFrames to a non-

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/28/2012 07:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> Actually, I believe that the error is probably in the Intel driver. As >> I understand it, it shouldn't be sending audio InfoFrames to a non-HDMI >> display. > > If that's the case then I'd still say "we're do

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/28/2012 07:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> Actually, I believe that the error is probably in the Intel driver. As >> I understand it, it shouldn't be sending audio InfoFrames to a non-HDMI >> display. > > If that's the case then I'd still say "we're do

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 08/27/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1310091/ - nak, the commit message >> itself gives away that we're doing else something wrong here. If >> DISABLE_AUDIO is sufficient for one driver it should be sufficient fo

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/27/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1310091/ - nak, the commit message > itself gives away that we're doing else something wrong here. If > DISABLE_AUDIO is sufficient for one driver it should be sufficient for all. Actually, I believe that the error i

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/28/12 7:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 08/27/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1310091/ - nak, the commit message itself gives away that we're doing else something wrong here. If DISABLE_AUDIO is sufficient for one driver it should be sufficient for all.

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/27/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1310091/ - nak, the commit message > itself gives away that we're doing else something wrong here. If > DISABLE_AUDIO is sufficient for one driver it should be sufficient for all. Actually, I believe that the error i

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
Hello, On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Hi guys (but mainly ajax) > > I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, > > I've made a bundle on patchwork for it > https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ I'd also like to get feedback about these: http://www.radix50.ne

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:24:02PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >Hi guys (but mainly ajax) > > > >I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, > > > >I've made a bundle on patchwork for it > >https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ >

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-28 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
Hello, On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Hi guys (but mainly ajax) > > I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, > > I've made a bundle on patchwork for it > https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ I'd also like to get feedback about these: http://www.radix50.ne

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Hi guys (but mainly ajax) >> >> I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, >> >> I've made a bundle on patchwork for it >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ > > > ht

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/27/12 4:34 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> Paul's FORCE_REDUCED_BLANKING series makes me nervous about what those >> monitors will do over VGA, since from a conversation we had on IRC he hasn't >> been able to test that. > > I asked the closed

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Hi guys (but mainly ajax) >> >> I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, >> >> I've made a bundle on patchwork for it >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ > > > htt

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Hi guys (but mainly ajax) > > I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, > > I've made a bundle on patchwork for it > https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1364501/ - I'm nervous about this on

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:24:02PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >Hi guys (but mainly ajax) > > > >I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, > > > >I've made a bundle on patchwork for it > >https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ >

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Hi guys (but mainly ajax) >> >> I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, >> >> I've made a bundle on patchwork for it >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ > > > ht

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/27/12 4:34 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: Paul's FORCE_REDUCED_BLANKING series makes me nervous about what those monitors will do over VGA, since from a conversation we had on IRC he hasn't been able to test that. I asked the closed driver di

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Hi guys (but mainly ajax) >> >> I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, >> >> I've made a bundle on patchwork for it >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ > > > htt

Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: Hi guys (but mainly ajax) I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, I've made a bundle on patchwork for it https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1364501/ - I'm nervous about this on non-EDD

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-24 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi guys (but mainly ajax) I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, I've made a bundle on patchwork for it https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ Dave.

-next queue and EDID stuff

2012-08-23 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi guys (but mainly ajax) I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding, I've made a bundle on patchwork for it https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/ Dave. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.