RE: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-12 Thread Rajeev Nandan
Hi Dmitry, Rob, Thanks for the review. > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:06:03PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan > wrote: > > > > > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should > > > be sufficient as they are fully optimized.

[v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-12 Thread Rajeev Nandan
In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where extreme board parasitics cause the eye shape to degrade, the override bits can be used to improve the signal quality. The general guidelines for DSI PHY tuni

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:06:03PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > > > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > > extreme board parasiti

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:25:35 +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > extreme board parasitics cause the eye shape to degrade, the override > bits can be used to imp

Re: [v2 1/3] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Add 10nm dsi phy tuning properties

2022-01-10 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rajeev Nandan wrote: > > In most cases, the default values of DSI PHY tuning registers should be > sufficient as they are fully optimized. However, in some cases where > extreme board parasitics cause the eye shape to degrade, the override > bits can be used to improv