On 2020-02-12 10:40, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:05 PM Jeffrey Hugo
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:28 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:59 AM Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:44 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:5
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:28 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:59 AM Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:44 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 PM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 7,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:44 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 PM wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:05 PM Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:28 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:59 AM Jeffrey Hugo
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:44 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 PM wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:59 AM Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:44 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffr
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 PM wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> For a given byte clock, if VCO recal
On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM wrote:
On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P
> wrote:
>>
>> For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
>> vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not ge
On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P
wrote:
For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
VCO is already set to required value. But Due to GDSC toggle,
VCO values ar
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
> >> vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
> >> VCO is a
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P wrote:
>
> For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
> vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
> VCO is already set to required value. But Due to GDSC toggle,
> VCO values are erased in the HW. To make sure VC
For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
VCO is already set to required value. But Due to GDSC toggle,
VCO values are erased in the HW. To make sure VCO is programmed
correctly, we forcefully call set_rate from vco_
11 matches
Mail list logo