On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
> stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
> exception to the rule.
>
> David
For 2.6.35
Acked-by: Dave Airlie
for 2.6.36 we are all good.
Dave.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
> stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
> exception to the rule.
A better fix ended up making it into 2.6.36 afterall, so we don't
anything for 2.6
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
> stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
> exception to the rule.
>
> David
For 2.6.35
Acked-by: Dave Airlie
for 2.6.36 we are all good.
Dave.
_
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
> stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
> exception to the rule.
A better fix ended up making it into 2.6.36 afterall, so we don't
anything for 2.6
I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
exception to the rule.
David?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:20:31PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 do not contain blit support for evergreen
> as
I need the ack from the DRM maintainer before I can add a patch to the
stable tree that is not upstream in Linus's tree, as it is a major
exception to the rule.
David?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:20:31PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 do not contain blit support for evergreen
> as
