On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wro
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> >>Hallo,
> >>
> >>I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> >>whether it is a bug or a
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Aaron Plattner
> wrote:
>> On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>> On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> O
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wro
On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
Hallo,
I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't
On 06/03/2013 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
Hallo,
I hope this is the right place to ask, because
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> >>Hallo,
> >>
> >>I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> >>whether it is a bug or a
On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
Hallo,
I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
When I boot my system the backligh
On 05/20/2013 02:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
>> whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
>> When I boot my system
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>> 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch>
>> Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with
>> analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value
>> range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end.
Hi,
>
> 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch>
> Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with
> analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value
> range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end. This results in
> light colors getting brighter an
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Joakim Plate wrote:
>> 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch>
>> Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with
>> analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value
>> range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end.
Hi,
>
> 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch>
> Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with
> analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value
> range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end. This results in
> light colors getting brighter an
2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> > whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
> > When I boot my system the backlight
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
> When I boot my system the backlight gets extremely bright compared to ol
2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> > whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
> > When I boot my system the backlight
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Jan Hinnerk Stosch wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
> whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
> When I boot my system the backlight gets extremely bright compared to ol
Hallo,
I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
When I boot my system the backlight gets extremely bright compared to older
kernel versions. It is most obvious when I leave X (more a yellow than a
b
Hallo,
I hope this is the right place to ask, because I actually don't know
whether it is a bug or a feature that I'm experiencing since linux 3.9:
When I boot my system the backlight gets extremely bright compared to older
kernel versions. It is most obvious when I leave X (more a yellow than a
b
20 matches
Mail list logo
