On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> >
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >
>> > This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
>>
>> It seems to work ok for me, but it causes quite a few new warning
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
>
> It seems to work ok for me, but it causes quite a few new warnings on
> my Sony VAIO Pro laptop. It's (once more) a regular i5-420
On 26 June 2015 at 18:05, Christian König wrote:
> Hey Dave,
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but didn't you wanted to send this pull request out for
> drm-next-merged instead of drm-next?
>
> Cause I'm still getting merge conflicts when I try to merge 4.1 into
> drm-next.
No generally Linus likes to do h
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
It seems to work ok for me, but it causes quite a few new warnings on
my Sony VAIO Pro laptop. It's (once more) a regular i5-4200U CPU (aka
Haswell, aka 4th gen Intel Core i5)
Most of them are in
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> No generally Linus likes to do his own merges with hints from us.
>
> unless it's really tricky.
Yup. And this time all the merges were trivial. My merge ended up
differing from Dave's simply because of an ordering of statements that
could b
Hey Dave,
I'm not 100% sure, but didn't you wanted to send this pull request out
for drm-next-merged instead of drm-next?
Cause I'm still getting merge conflicts when I try to merge 4.1 into
drm-next.
Regards,
Christian.
On 26.06.2015 03:00, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the main
Hi Linus,
This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
I've one other new driver from freescale on my radar, it's been posted and
reviewed, I'd just like to get someone to give it a last look, so maybe
I'll send it or maybe I'll leave it.
There is no major nouveau changes in here, Ben was work