Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > ca5

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 11:31 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > >> > > >> > /va

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight: >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight: >

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher >>> wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Fe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 11:31 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > >> > > >> > /va

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher >>> wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Fe

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-03 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's some

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-03 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's some

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris W

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat D

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >>> > >>> > /var/log/kern.log:

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.20

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit >> >> So I don't think that's actually the cause of

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sed

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, >

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >>> > >>> > /var/log/kern

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher >>> wrote: ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad c

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] >> > [drm:intel_

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher >> wrote: >>> ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit >> >> So I don't think that's actually the cause

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25,

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Alex Deucher (29)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] >> > [drm:intel_dp_a

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did no

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: Alex Deucher (29): drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> Alex Deucher (29): >>> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (6xx/7xx) >>> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabl

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> Alex Deucher (29): >>> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (6xx/7xx) >>> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabl

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Alex Deucher (29): >> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (6xx/7xx) >> drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (evergreen) >> drm/radeon: halt engines befor

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's som

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Alex Deucher (29): > drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (6xx/7xx) > drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (evergreen) > drm/radeon: halt engines before disabling MC (cayman/TN) > drm/radeon: halt engines

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight: >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight: >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > If you want to just bump it so Ironlake isn't affected, (patch attached). It works fine 95% of the time and isn't a hard failure when it doesn't, so this isn't critical. I can wait for it to be fixed a while. > Is this external DP monitor o

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > If you want to just bump it so Ironlake isn't affected, (patch attached). It works fine 95% of the time and isn't a hard failure when it doesn't, so this isn't critical. I can wait for it to be fixed a while. > Is this external DP monitor o

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's som

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Lowlight: > > [5.710827] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not > signal timeout (has irq: 1)! Oh, forgot to mention - this is my trusty old Westmere chip (aka "Core i5-670", aka Clarkdale, aka GMA-some-random-number).

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Lowlight: > > [5.710827] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not > signal timeout (has irq: 1)! Oh, forgot to mention - this is my trusty old Westmere chip (aka "Core i5-670", aka Clarkdale, aka GMA-some-random-number).

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Highlights: > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > code, Lowlight: There's something wrong with i915 DP detection or whatever. I get stuff like this:

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Highlights: > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > code, Lowlight: There's something wrong with i915 DP detection or whatever. I get stuff like this:

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Airlie
> > I did the fun conflict resolution, so my tree doesn't have the ordering > changes. > > I also did some things slightly differently from you - you had left > some direct ib[] accesses that I spotted (see for example "case 0x48" > (aka "Copy L2T Frame to Field"), and yours apparently has a few c

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, This is the main drm pull for the 3.9-rc1 merge, and my chance to have my email published verbatim as an article by the worst news site ever. So up front, this has a massive merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c I've fixed it up in drm-next-merged in the same tree,

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Dave Airlie
> > I did the fun conflict resolution, so my tree doesn't have the ordering > changes. > > I also did some things slightly differently from you - you had left > some direct ib[] accesses that I spotted (see for example "case 0x48" > (aka "Copy L2T Frame to Field"), and yours apparently has a few c

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So up front, this has a massive merge conflict in > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c I've fixed it up in drm-next-merged > in the same tree, I fixed up some small ordering issues in my merge as > well, however they aren't important if yo

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So up front, this has a massive merge conflict in > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c I've fixed it up in drm-next-merged > in the same tree, I fixed up some small ordering issues in my merge as > well, however they aren't important if yo