On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:47:43AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:33 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > What I was interested in was more about the context itself, and I'd
> > still like an answer on whether it's ok to wait for a review for 5
> > months though, or if it's a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:33 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> What I was interested in was more about the context itself, and I'd
> still like an answer on whether it's ok to wait for a review for 5
> months though, or if it's an expectation from now on that we are
> supposed to fix bugs over the week
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:10:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:17 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I find that situation to be a bit ridiculous.
>
> Honestly, the original report about the pulseaudio problem came in
> over two weeks ago, and all you seem
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:17 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but I find that situation to be a bit ridiculous.
Honestly, the original report about the pulseaudio problem came in
over two weeks ago, and all you seemed to do was to ignore everything
that Sudip said and reported.
THAT is the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:17 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:19:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:05 AM Sudip Mukherjee
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > And indeed, reverting 27da370e0fb3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Remove
> > > drm_encoder->crtc usage") on top of
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:55:31AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 11:18:33AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > > now and seems
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:19:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:05 AM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> >
> > And indeed, reverting 27da370e0fb3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Remove
> > drm_encoder->crtc usage") on top of d4d016caa4b8 ("alpha: move
> > __udiv_qrnnd library function to arch
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 11:18:33AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > now and seems valid. But I really *really* want to stress how locking
> > is important.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:05 AM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> And indeed, reverting 27da370e0fb3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Remove
> drm_encoder->crtc usage") on top of d4d016caa4b8 ("alpha: move
> __udiv_qrnnd library function to arch/alpha/lib/")
> has fixed the error.
Ok, since your pulseaudio problem was
Hi Linus,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:06 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:48 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> >
> > Also, I have now tested by reverting those two commits and I still get
> > the same trace on rpi4.
>
> Ok. I'm afraid we really need to have the VC4 people figure
Sure, no problem. Here are the patch files that make it work for me:
https://github.com/gokrazy/kernel/blob/d04d64114aae51aa27752adca6080ed4c9a0c70c/0001-Revert-drm-vc4-hdmi-Make-sure-the-controller-is-powe.patch
https://github.com/gokrazy/kernel/blob/d04d64114aae51aa27752adca6080ed4c9a0c70c/0002-
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:48 PM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> Also, I have now tested by reverting those two commits and I still get
> the same trace on rpi4.
Ok. I'm afraid we really need to have the VC4 people figure it out - I
count do the two reverts that are reported to fix the RPi3 issue, but
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 11:15 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:00 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> >
> > Its still there. I am seeing it every night. This was from last night
> > - https://lava.qa.codethink.co.uk/scheduler/job/164#L1356
>
> Note that that web server is not avai
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:00 PM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> Its still there. I am seeing it every night. This was from last night
> - https://lava.qa.codethink.co.uk/scheduler/job/164#L1356
Note that that web server is not available at least to me. Looks like
some internal name or limited dns, I
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 1:13 PM Michael Stapelberg
wrote:
>
> > Michael - do things work if you revert those two (sadly, they don't
> > revert cleanly exactly _because_ of the other changes in the same
> > area)?
>
> Reverting only 9984d6664ce9 is not sufficient, but reverting both
> 9984d6664ce9
Hi Linus,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 8:24 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:18 AM Michael Stapelberg
> wrote:
> >
> > torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > > now and seems valid.
On Sat, 18 Sept 2021 at 21:24, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:18 AM Michael Stapelberg
> wrote:
> >
> > torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > > now and seems valid. But I reall
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:18 AM Michael Stapelberg
wrote:
>
> torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > now and seems valid. But I really *really* want to stress how locking
> > is important.
>
> As far a
CC Emma and Maxime
On Saturday, September 18th, 2021 at 11:18, Michael Stapelberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> > Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> > now and seems valid. But I really *really* want to stress ho
Hi,
torvalds at linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> Did I fix it up correctly? Who knows. The code makes more sense to me
> now and seems valid. But I really *really* want to stress how locking
> is important.
As far as I can tell, this merge conflict resolution made my Raspberry
Pi 3
Am 2021-07-01 um 4:15 p.m. schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:34 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> This is the main drm pull request for 5.14-rc1.
>>
>> I've done a test pull into your current tree, and hit two conflicts
>> (one in vc4, one in amdgpu), both seem pretty triv
The pull request you sent on Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:34:15 +1000:
> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm tags/drm-next-2021-07-01
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e058a84bfddc42ba356a2316f2cf1141974625c9
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://kor
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:34 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the main drm pull request for 5.14-rc1.
>
> I've done a test pull into your current tree, and hit two conflicts
> (one in vc4, one in amdgpu), both seem pretty trivial, the amdgpu one
> is recent and sfr sent out a resolu
23 matches
Mail list logo
