Hi
Am 08.01.20 um 03:25 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The previous throughput was reduced from 43955 to 35691, and there is a
> little increase in next-20200106,
> but there is no obvious change after the patchset:
OK, I would have hoped for some improvements. Anyway, thanks for testing.
Hi Thomas,
The previous throughput was reduced from 43955 to 35691, and there is a little
increase in next-20200106,
but there is no obvious change after the patchset:
commit:
f1f8555dfb ("drm/bochs: Use shadow buffer for bochs framebuffer console")
90f479ae51 ("drm/mgag200: Replace struc
Hi Feng,
do you still have the test setup that produced the performance penalty?
If so, could you give a try to the patchset at [1]? I think I've fixed
the remaining issues in earlier versions and I'd like to see if it
actually improves performance.
Best regards
Thomas
[1]
https://lists.freedes
Hi
Am 16.09.19 um 11:06 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:12:37PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 28.08.1
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:12:37PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Am 28.08.19 um 11:37 schrieb Rong Chen:
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>
Hi
Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 28.08.19 um 11:37 schrieb Rong Chen:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Che
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:37:47PM +0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM Feng Tang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vetter,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:20:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM Feng Tang wrote:
>
> Hi Vetter,
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:20:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 19:17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Fe
Hi Vetter,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:20:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 19:17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Feng Tang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
Hi Thomas,
On 9/4/2019 4:43 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 04.09.19 um 10:35 schrieb Feng Tang:
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
Thank you for t
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 19:17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Feng Tang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 A
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 19:17, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Feng Tang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Feng Tang wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > > >> Thank you for testing. Bu
Hi
Am 04.09.19 um 10:35 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited,
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > >> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited, because the patch
> > >> simulates a bug that was
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> >> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited, because the patch
> >> simulates a bug that was present in the original mgag200 code. A
> >> significant number of frames are simply ski
Hi
Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
>> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited, because the patch
>> simulates a bug that was present in the original mgag200 code. A
>> significant number of frames are simply skipped. That is apparently the
>> reason why it's faster.
>
> Thanks fo
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 28.08.19 um 11:37 schrieb Rong Chen:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
> >>> Both patches have little impact on
Hi
Am 28.08.19 um 11:37 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
>>> Both patches have little impact on the performance from our side.
>> Thanks for testing. Too bad they doesn't solve the issue.
>>
>>
Hi Thomas,
On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
Both patches have little impact on the performance from our side.
Thanks for testing. Too bad they doesn't solve the issue.
There's another patch attached. Could you please tests this as wel
Hi
Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
>
> Both patches have little impact on the performance from our side.
Thanks for testing. Too bad they doesn't solve the issue.
There's another patch attached. Could you please tests this as well?
Thanks a lot!
The patch comes from Daniel Vetter af
Hi Thomas,
On 8/26/2019 6:50 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Feng
Am 24.08.19 um 07:16 schrieb Feng Tang:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
No problem! I guessed so :)
Am 13.
Hi Feng
Am 24.08.19 um 07:16 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
>
> No problem! I guessed so :)
>
>>
>> Am 13.08.19 um 11:36 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
No problem! I guessed so :)
>
> Am 13.08.19 um 11:36 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, F
Hi
Am 22.08.19 um 22:02 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 03:25, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
>>
>> Am 13.08.19 um 11:36 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, Fe
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 03:25, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
>
> Am 13.08.19 um 11:36 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 0
Hi
I was traveling and could reply earlier. Sorry for taking so long.
Am 13.08.19 um 11:36 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
> Actually we
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 05:36:16PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > >>Actually we run the benchmark as a backgro
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:25:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >>Actually we run the benchmark as a background process, do we need to
> > >>disable the cursor and test again?
> > >There's a worker
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>Actually we run the benchmark as a background process, do we need to
> >>disable the cursor and test again?
> >There's a worker thread that updates the display from the shadow buffer.
> >The blinking cursor periodic
Hi,
On 8/7/19 6:42 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Rong
Am 06.08.19 um 14:59 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
Hi,
On 8/5/2019 6:25 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen:
Hi,
On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Th
Hi Rong
Am 06.08.19 um 14:59 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/5/2019 6:25 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann
Hi,
On 8/5/2019 6:25 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen:
Hi,
On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
cur
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:22:11PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
> >> 2019-08-03 19:29:17 ./case-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb
> >> 2019-08-03 19:29:17 ./usemem --runtime 300 -n 4 --prealloc --prefault
> >> -O -U 815394406
> >> 917318700 bytes / 659419 usecs = 135
Hi
Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
>>> cursor affects performance of
Hi
Am 05.08.19 um 09:02 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
>> cursor affects performance of the vm-scalability test case.
>>
>> I only have a 4-c
Hi,
On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
cursor affects performance of the vm-scalability test case.
I only have a 4-core machine, so scalab
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
> cursor affects performance of the vm-scalability test case.
>
> I only have a 4-core machine, so scalability is not really testable. Ye
Hi
I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking
cursor affects performance of the vm-scalability test case.
I only have a 4-core machine, so scalability is not really testable. Yet
I see the effects of running vm-scalibility against drm-tip, a revert of
the mgag200 patc
Hi
Am 02.08.19 um 11:11 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:10:54PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 31.07.19 um 10:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>
Hi
Am 02.08.19 um 09:11 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/1/19 7:58 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 01.08.19 um 13:25 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:10:54PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 31.07.19 um 10:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmerma
Hi
Am 02.08.19 um 09:11 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/1/19 7:58 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 01.08.19 um 13:25 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 15:30 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2019-08-01 8:19 a.m., Rong Chen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 7/31/19 6:21 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 2019-07-31 11:25 a.m., Huang, Ying wrote:
Hi, Daniel,
Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airli
Hi,
On 8/1/19 7:58 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 13:25 schrieb Feng Tang:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
commit: 90f479ae51
On 2019-08-01 8:19 a.m., Rong Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/31/19 6:21 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-07-31 11:25 a.m., Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Hi, Daniel,
>>>
>>> Daniel Vetter writes:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vette
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 13:25 schrieb Feng Tang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
>
> commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9b94b9660dd3e4 ("drm/mgag200:
> >>>
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
>>>
>>> commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9b94b9660dd3e4 ("drm/mgag200:
>>> Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic framebuffer emulation")
>>> https://kernel.goog
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 08:19 schrieb Rong Chen:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/31/19 6:21 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-07-31 11:25 a.m., Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Hi, Daniel,
>>>
>>> Daniel Vetter writes:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vet
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> >
> >commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9b94b9660dd3e4 ("drm/mgag200:
> >Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic framebuffer emulation")
> >https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
Hi,
On 7/31/19 6:21 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2019-07-31 11:25 a.m., Huang, Ying wrote:
Hi, Daniel,
Daniel Vetter writes:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
H
On 2019-07-31 11:25 a.m., Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi
Am 31.07.19 um 11:25 schrieb Huang, Ying:
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
wrote:
>
> Hi
>>>
Hi
Am 31.07.19 um 10:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
>>> wrote:
Hi
Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Hi, Daniel,
Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:50 PM Thomas Z
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 05:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
> > > wrote:
> > >> Am 29.07.19 um 11:51 schrieb kernel test rob
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> >> Am 29.07.19 um 11:51 schrieb kernel test robot:
> >>> Greeting,
> >>>
> >>> FYI, we noticed a -18.8% regression of
Hi
Am 30.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Am 29.07.19 um 11:51 schrieb kernel test robot:
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -18.8% regression of vm-scalability.median due to commit:>
>>>
>>> commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdd
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:50 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 29.07.19 um 11:51 schrieb kernel test robot:
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed a -18.8% regression of vm-scalability.median due to commit:>
> >
> > commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9b94b9660dd3e4 ("drm/mgag200: Replace
> > struct
Am 29.07.19 um 11:51 schrieb kernel test robot:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -18.8% regression of vm-scalability.median due to commit:>
>
> commit: 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9b94b9660dd3e4 ("drm/mgag200: Replace
> struct mga_fbdev with generic framebuffer emulation")
> https://kernel.google
62 matches
Mail list logo
