On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > small observaton, clk_is_same() is linguistically nicer.
> >
> > How about clk_equal() ?
>
> That's good, the only issue that's not clear in any of these names is
> that does this mean "the same clock", a "clock of the same rate" or a
> "clock that is
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:56:58AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2015, 09:02 + schrieb Ben Dooks:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> [...]
> > > From: Michael Turquette
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:11:01 -0800
> > > Subject: [PATCH
Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2015, 09:02 + schrieb Ben Dooks:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
[...]
> > From: Michael Turquette
> > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:11:01 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] clk: introduce clk_is_match
> >
> > Some drivers compare struct clk poin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Shawn Guo (2015-02-25 06:53:31)
> > Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
> > instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk
> > pointers are pointing to the same hardware
