[RFCv2 PATCH 0/5] virtual GEM provider

2012-02-13 Thread Adam Jackson
On 2/8/12 6:19 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Incorporated some of the feedback given to Adam's original patch. > > My intention is to use this to do some dmabuf work/testing with i915 > since it seemed too difficult to get some of Dave Airlie's stuff > working, and I really don't feel like learning any

Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 0/5] virtual GEM provider

2012-02-13 Thread Adam Jackson
On 2/8/12 6:19 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: Incorporated some of the feedback given to Adam's original patch. My intention is to use this to do some dmabuf work/testing with i915 since it seemed too difficult to get some of Dave Airlie's stuff working, and I really don't feel like learning anything a

[RFCv2 PATCH 0/5] virtual GEM provider

2012-02-09 Thread Ben Widawsky
Incorporated some of the feedback given to Adam's original patch. My intention is to use this to do some dmabuf work/testing with i915 since it seemed too difficult to get some of Dave Airlie's stuff working, and I really don't feel like learning anything about nouveau if I can avoid it. (thoug

[RFCv2 PATCH 0/5] virtual GEM provider

2012-02-08 Thread Ben Widawsky
Incorporated some of the feedback given to Adam's original patch. My intention is to use this to do some dmabuf work/testing with i915 since it seemed too difficult to get some of Dave Airlie's stuff working, and I really don't feel like learning anything about nouveau if I can avoid it. (thoug