Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-08 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Matt Roper wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:18:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> > wrote: >> > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clar

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-08 Thread Matt Roper
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:18:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: ... > > >> + > > >> + state = dev->driver->a

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> yeah, current atomic patch is almost an afterthought in this series. >> I still need to get planes working on msm and find some test code (I >> guess you have some somewhere?).. so

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > yeah, current atomic patch is almost an afterthought in this series. > I still need to get planes working on msm and find some test code (I > guess you have some somewhere?).. so other than just rebasing it > enough to compile, I didn't

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> >>

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob C

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> >> >> The atomic modeset i

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä > wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> From: Ville Syrjälä > >> > >> The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values > >> for obje

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values >> for object properties. The driver can then check the full device >> configuration

Re: [RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:45:49PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values > for object properties. The driver can then check the full device > configuration as single unit, and try to apply the changes atomically. >

[RFCv1 11/12] drm: Atomic modeset ioctl

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Clark
From: Ville Syrjälä The atomic modeset ioctl cna be used to push any number of new values for object properties. The driver can then check the full device configuration as single unit, and try to apply the changes atomically. The ioctl simply takes a list of object IDs and property IDs and their