2016-07-12 Dominik Behr :
> Gustavo, you added fence_put()
> in __drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(), shouldn't we also add a
> corresponding fence_get() in __drm_atomic_helper_plane_duplicate_state() ?
Yes, my new version of the patches that already have an extra
fence_get()
https://git.ke
Gustavo, you added fence_put()
in __drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(), shouldn't we also add a
corresponding fence_get() in __drm_atomic_helper_plane_duplicate_state() ?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Daniel Stone
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 23:28, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And e
On 04/26/2016 11:39 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And even in the cases
>> where you could make a 1-to-1 mapping between planes and fences, it's not
>> that much more work for userspace to assemble those fences into an array
>> anyway.
>
> I'm ok
Hi,
On 28 April 2016 at 23:28, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
>>> A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And even in the cases
>>> where you could make a 1-to-1 mapping bet
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>> > - implicit fences also needs one fence per plane/fb, so it will be good to
>> >match with that.
>>
>> We would actually need a fence per object rather than per fb.
>
> I guess you could overcome this by automagically creating a merg
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:56:19PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
> >
> > Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a plane, or ever?
> > That might cause some odd
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Gustavo Padovan
wrote:
> 2016-04-28 Ville Syrjälä :
>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
>> > wrote:
>> > >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
>> > >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >>> What a
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
>
> Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a plane, or ever?
> That might cause some oddness if you, say, leave a fence attached to one
> plane and then do a modes
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> >>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter w
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >>> What a
2016-04-28 Ville Syrjälä :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> > wrote:
> > >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
> > >
> > > Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a pla
2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
> Hi,
>
> On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> What are they doing that can't stuff the fences into an array
> >>> instead of props?
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville S
Hi,
On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> What are they doing that can't stuff the fences into an array
>>> instead of props?
>>
>> The hw composer interface is one in-
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjä
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > > >
> > > > There is now
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > >
> > > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > > state that rece
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > >
> > > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > > state that rece
On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> But really the reason for per-plane is hw compos
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> state that receives the sync_file fd from userspace via the atomic commit
> IOCTL.
I still don't like this property abuse. Also with
2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > state that receives the sync_file fd from userspace via the atomic commit
> > IOCTL.
>
> I st
From: Gustavo Padovan
There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
state that receives the sync_file fd from userspace via the atomic commit
IOCTL.
The fd is then translated to a fence (that may be a fence_collection
subclass or just a normal fence) and then used by DRM to
29 matches
Mail list logo
