[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-30 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic > wrote: >> The following set of patches is the reword of the series >> sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] >> branch. Details of the original series are described in [

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-30 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic > wrote: >> The following set of patches is the reword of the series >> sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] >> branch. Details of the original series are described in [

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-30 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic > wrote: >> The following set of patches is the reword of the series >> sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] >> branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. > > Th

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-30 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: The following set of patches is the reword of the series sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. Thanks for loo

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:45AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic > wrote: > > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > > branch. Details of the original series are des

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-20 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. Thanks for looking at this, So one thing about adding

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:45AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic > wrote: > > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > > branch. Details of the original series are des

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-20 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. Thanks for looking at this, So one thing about adding

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:19:25PM -0400, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. > > Patches in this series have been reworked (

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ilija Hadzic
The following set of patches is the reword of the series sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. Patches in this series have been reworked (and a few prep patches have been added) to address the comment about the

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrj?l? wrote: > Didn't have time for a detailed look yet, but at least one thing > missing from your patch set is handling of possible_crtcs and > possible_clones for getplane and getencoder ioctls. Yes I agree and I know. That is still work in progress.

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ilija Hadzic
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote: Didn't have time for a detailed look yet, but at least one thing missing from your patch set is handling of possible_crtcs and possible_clones for getplane and getencoder ioctls. Yes I agree and I know. That is still work in progress. Th

Re: [RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:19:25PM -0400, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > The following set of patches is the reword of the series > sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] > branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. > > Patches in this series have been reworked (

[RFC v2] Revive the work on render-nodes branch

2012-04-12 Thread Ilija Hadzic
The following set of patches is the reword of the series sent two weeks ago [2] that will revive the drm-render-nodes [1] branch. Details of the original series are described in [2]. Patches in this series have been reworked (and a few prep patches have been added) to address the comment about the