On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:20 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 18:44:03 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> >
> > struct
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 18:44:03 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
> +#include
>
> struct netpoll_info;
> struct device;
> @@ -808,6 +810,84 @@ bool rps_may_expire_fl
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:38 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2023/11/10 10:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole infra... the above line is
> >> confusing. Why do you increment dma_addr? it will be re-ini
On 2023/11/10 10:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole infra... the above line is
>> confusing. Why do you increment dma_addr? it will be re-initialized in
>> the next iteration.
>>
>
> That is just a mistake
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:30 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole infra... the above line is
> confusing. Why do you increment dma_addr? it will be re-initialized in
> the next iteration.
>
That is just a mistake, sorry. Will remove this increment.
On Thu, Nov 9,
On 2023/11/9 10:22, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:40 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/11/8 5:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:46 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> +
> +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(stru
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 18:44 -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
[...]
> +int netdev_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> +struct netdev_dmabuf_binding **out)
> +{
> + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + struct dma_bu
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:47 PM David Wei wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-05 18:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > Add a netdev_dmabuf_binding struct which represents the
> > dma-buf-to-netdevice binding. The netlink API will bind the dma-buf to
> > rx queues on the netdevice. On the binding, the dma_buf_attach
> >
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:40 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2023/11/8 5:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:46 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> >>> +{
On 2023-11-05 18:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> Add a netdev_dmabuf_binding struct which represents the
> dma-buf-to-netdevice binding. The netlink API will bind the dma-buf to
> rx queues on the netdevice. On the binding, the dma_buf_attach
> & dma_buf_map_attachment will occur. The entries in the sg_t
On 2023/11/8 5:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:46 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
>>> +
>>> +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t size, avail;
>>> +
>>> + gen_pool_for_each_chun
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:46 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > +
> > +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + size_t size, avail;
> > +
> > + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool,
> > +
On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> +
> +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> +{
> + size_t size, avail;
> +
> + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool,
> + netdev_devmem_free_chunk_owner, NULL);
> +
> + size =
Add a netdev_dmabuf_binding struct which represents the
dma-buf-to-netdevice binding. The netlink API will bind the dma-buf to
rx queues on the netdevice. On the binding, the dma_buf_attach
& dma_buf_map_attachment will occur. The entries in the sg_table from
mapping will be inserted into a genpool
14 matches
Mail list logo
