å¨ 2016/6/3 20:36, Heiko Stübner åé:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin:
>> How about merge it into your patch#3.
>
> see comments from Doug and me on previous version.
>
> clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both
> clock and
Hi Lin
How about merge it into your patch#3.
On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang
> ---
> Changes in v1:
> - None
>
> include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h
> b/include/dt-
Signed-off-by: Lin Huang
---
Changes in v1:
- None
include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h
b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h
index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru
Hi Shawn,
Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin:
> How about merge it into your patch#3.
see comments from Doug and me on previous version.
clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both
clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate branc
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Ah, I missed the previous version as I think it should be from
> non-version to v2 rather than from non-version to v1, which IIRC is from
> Doug. :)
Yup, patch-numbering is 1-based, not 0-based, so typically you have
no-version => v2 => v3 =
