On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 07:49:24AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Jordan Crouse (2020-08-13 00:55:44)
> > This is an RFC because I'm still trying to grok the correct behavior.
> >
> > Consider a dma_fence_array created two two fence and signal_on_any is true.
> > A reference to dma_fence_arr
Am 13.08.20 um 01:55 schrieb Jordan Crouse:
This is an RFC because I'm still trying to grok the correct behavior.
Consider a dma_fence_array created two two fence and signal_on_any is true.
A reference to dma_fence_array is taken for each waiting fence.
Ok, that sounds like you seem to mix a c
Quoting Jordan Crouse (2020-08-13 00:55:44)
> This is an RFC because I'm still trying to grok the correct behavior.
>
> Consider a dma_fence_array created two two fence and signal_on_any is true.
> A reference to dma_fence_array is taken for each waiting fence.
>
> When the client calls dma_fence
This is an RFC because I'm still trying to grok the correct behavior.
Consider a dma_fence_array created two two fence and signal_on_any is true.
A reference to dma_fence_array is taken for each waiting fence.
When the client calls dma_fence_wait() only one of the fences is signaled.
The client r
