On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 14:33 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> hmm, I failed to apply this one, could you refresh against gvt-staging branch
>
> on https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux?
Done. I've sent out the rebased (and re-tested) patch.
Julian
___
dri-devel
On 2020.01.20 14:22:10 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2020.01.09 19:13:54 +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> > Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
> > directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
> > what state KVMGT needs to keep.
> >
> > The intent
On 2020.01.09 19:13:54 +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
> directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
> what state KVMGT needs to keep.
>
> The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
> hypervi
Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
what state KVMGT needs to keep.
The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
hypervisor backends for the mediator, without having to touch the
mediato
