On 11/06/2025 22:21, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 13:27 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 03/06/2025 10:31, Philipp Stanner wrote:
What I am not that ecstatic about is only getting the Suggested-by
credit in 1/6. Given it is basically my patch with some cosmetic
changes
like the
> On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 13:27 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On 03/06/2025 10:31, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > What I am not that ecstatic about is only getting the Suggested-by
> > credit in 1/6. Given it is basically my patch with some cosmetic
> > changes
> > like the kernel doc and the cancel
On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 13:27 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2025 10:31, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > An alternative version to [1], based on Tvrtko's suggestion from
> > [2].
> >
> > I tested this for Nouveau. Works.
> >
> > I'm having, however, bigger problems properly porting the unit
On 03/06/2025 10:31, Philipp Stanner wrote:
An alternative version to [1], based on Tvrtko's suggestion from [2].
I tested this for Nouveau. Works.
I'm having, however, bigger problems properly porting the unit tests and
have seen various explosions. In the process I noticed that some things
An alternative version to [1], based on Tvrtko's suggestion from [2].
I tested this for Nouveau. Works.
I'm having, however, bigger problems properly porting the unit tests and
have seen various explosions. In the process I noticed that some things
in the unit tests aren't right and a bit of a la
