Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-07-09 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi Daniel, Le mer. 8 juil. 2020 à 9:23, Daniel Vetter a écrit : On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:32:25PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: (cc Dillon) Den 03.07.2020 19.26, skrev Sam Ravnborg: > Hi Noralf/Paul. > > Trying to stir up this discussion again. > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 06:36:22PM +0

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-07-08 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 08.07.2020 14.49, skrev Paul Cercueil: > Hi Daniel, > > Le mer. 8 juil. 2020 à 9:23, Daniel Vetter a écrit : >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:32:25PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: >>>  (cc Dillon) >>> >>>  Den 03.07.2020 19.26, skrev Sam Ravnborg: >>>  > Hi Noralf/Paul. >>>  > >>>  > Trying to

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-07-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:32:25PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > (cc Dillon) > > Den 03.07.2020 19.26, skrev Sam Ravnborg: > > Hi Noralf/Paul. > > > > Trying to stir up this discussion again. > > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > >> > >> > >> Den 07.06.2020 1

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-07-07 Thread Noralf Trønnes
(cc Dillon) Den 03.07.2020 19.26, skrev Sam Ravnborg: > Hi Noralf/Paul. > > Trying to stir up this discussion again. > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: >> >> >> Den 07.06.2020 15.38, skrev Paul Cercueil: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here's a follow-up on the previous discussi

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-07-03 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Noralf/Paul. Trying to stir up this discussion again. On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > Den 07.06.2020 15.38, skrev Paul Cercueil: > > Hi, > > > > Here's a follow-up on the previous discussion about the current state of > > DSI/DBI panel drivers, TinyDRM,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-18 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi Emil, Le mar. 16 juin 2020 à 18:47, Emil Velikov a écrit : Hi all, Allow me to compare this approach with some work Linus W [1] did a while back, which I've just noticed. Pauls' approach: - Perhaps the shortest one possible Porting an existing DSI panel to DBI is 3 lines of code - compa

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-17 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi Emil, Le mar. 16 juin 2020 à 18:47, Emil Velikov a écrit : Hi all, Allow me to compare this approach with some work Linus W [1] did a while back, which I've just noticed. Pauls' approach: - Perhaps the shortest one possible Porting an existing DSI panel to DBI is 3 lines of code - compa

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-16 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi all, Allow me to compare this approach with some work Linus W [1] did a while back, which I've just noticed. Pauls' approach: - Perhaps the shortest one possible Porting an existing DSI panel to DBI is 3 lines of code - compat line in the SPI/DSI bridge, a bus_type and mipi_dsi_maybe_registe

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-15 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi Noralf, Le dim. 14 juin 2020 à 18:36, Noralf Trønnes a écrit : Den 07.06.2020 15.38, skrev Paul Cercueil: Hi, Here's a follow-up on the previous discussion about the current state of DSI/DBI panel drivers, TinyDRM, and the need of a cleanup. This patchset introduces the followin

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-14 Thread Noralf Trønnes
Den 07.06.2020 15.38, skrev Paul Cercueil: > Hi, > > Here's a follow-up on the previous discussion about the current state of > DSI/DBI panel drivers, TinyDRM, and the need of a cleanup. > > This patchset introduces the following: > * It slightly tweaks the MIPI DSI code so that it supports MI

[RFC PATCH 0/4] DSI/DBI and TinyDRM driver

2020-06-07 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi, Here's a follow-up on the previous discussion about the current state of DSI/DBI panel drivers, TinyDRM, and the need of a cleanup. This patchset introduces the following: * It slightly tweaks the MIPI DSI code so that it supports MIPI DBI over various buses. This patch has been tested with