[RFC PATCH] drm: rework flip-work helpers to avoid calling func when the FIFO is full

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:47:05 +0200 Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:41:12 -0400 > Rob Clark wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Boris BREZILLON > > wrote: > > > Make use of lists instead of kfifo in order to dynamically allocate > > > task entry when someone require s

[RFC PATCH] drm: rework flip-work helpers to avoid calling func when the FIFO is full

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:41:12 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Boris BREZILLON > wrote: > > Make use of lists instead of kfifo in order to dynamically allocate > > task entry when someone require some delayed work, and thus preventing > > drm_flip_work_queue from directl

[RFC PATCH] drm: rework flip-work helpers to avoid calling func when the FIFO is full

Make use of lists instead of kfifo in order to dynamically allocate task entry when someone require some delayed work, and thus preventing drm_flip_work_queue from directly calling func instead of queuing this call. This allow drm_flip_work_queue to be safely called even within irq handlers. Add n

[RFC PATCH] drm: rework flip-work helpers to avoid calling func when the FIFO is full

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:41:12 -0400 > Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Boris BREZILLON >> wrote: >> > Make use of lists instead of kfifo in order to dynamically allocate >> > task entry when someone require some del

[RFC PATCH] drm: rework flip-work helpers to avoid calling func when the FIFO is full

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Make use of lists instead of kfifo in order to dynamically allocate > task entry when someone require some delayed work, and thus preventing > drm_flip_work_queue from directly calling func instead of queuing this > call. > This allow drm_